453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9197098)
1. Functional loads on freestanding and connected implants in three-unit mandibular prostheses opposing complete dentures: an in vivo study.
Gunne J; Rangert B; Glantz PO; Svensson A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 9197098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On occlusal forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses.
Falk H
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1990; 69():1-40. PubMed ID: 2196708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: a 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system.
Romeo E; Lops D; Margutti E; Ghisolfi M; Chiapasco M; Vogel G
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):247-59. PubMed ID: 15101597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo forces on implants influenced by occlusal scheme and food consistency.
Morneburg TR; Pröschel PA
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):481-6. PubMed ID: 14651231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Occlusal interferences and cantilever joint stress in implant-supported prostheses occluding with complete dentures.
Falk H; Laurell L; Lundgren D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 2391138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment.
Rangert BR; Sullivan RM; Jemt TM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):360-70. PubMed ID: 9197101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Removable dentures with implant support in strategic positions followed for up to 8 years.
Kaufmann R; Friedli M; Hug S; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):233-41; discussion 242. PubMed ID: 19548404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of implant number on transverse bending moments during simulated unilateral loading of mandibular fixed-detachable prostheses.
Korioth TW; Chew CB; Chung DH
J Oral Implantol; 1998; 24(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 9835836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-year prospective follow-up of implant/tooth-supported versus freestanding implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Dec; 28(6):593-9. PubMed ID: 19146055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses.
Wyatt CC; Zarb GA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):204-11. PubMed ID: 9581406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediate function with fixed implant-supported maxillary dentures: a 12-month pilot study.
Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Menini M; Ravera G; Drago C; Pera P
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):351-60. PubMed ID: 18456046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maintenance requirements of implant-supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant-supported fixed prostheses, natural teeth, or complete dentures: a 5-year retrospective study.
Davis DM; Packer ME; Watson RM
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):521-3. PubMed ID: 14651238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of implant support on distal-extension removable partial dentures: in vivo assessment.
Ohkubo C; Kobayashi M; Suzuki Y; Hosoi T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1095-101. PubMed ID: 19216279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An overview of complete artificial fixed dentition supported by endosseous implants.
Flanagan D
Artif Organs; 2005 Jan; 29(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 15644087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Within-subject comparison between connected and nonconnected tooth-to-implant fixed partial prostheses: up to 14-year follow-up study.
Hosny M; Duyck J; van Steenberghe D; Naert I
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(4):340-6. PubMed ID: 11203652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Waldenberger O; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vivo force measurements on maxillary implants supporting a fixed prosthesis or an overdenture: a pilot study.
Mericske-Stern R; Venetz E; Fahrländer F; Bürgin W
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):535-47. PubMed ID: 11105009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
