453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9197098)
61. Microstrains around standard and mini implants supporting different bridge designs.
Sallam H; Kheiralla LS; Aldawakly A
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 20712439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Treatment planning to retain hopeless teeth as support for transitional appliances: three case reports.
Mercurio RJ
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 12498458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Success and failure in partial edentulism treated with implant-supported bridges.
Purton DG; Carter GM; Hunter KM
N Z Dent J; 1994 Sep; 90(401):98-102. PubMed ID: 7970335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Effect of tilted and short distal implants on axial forces and bending moments in implants supporting fixed dental prostheses: an in vitro study.
Ogawa T; Dhaliwal S; Naert I; Mine A; Kronstrom M; Sasaki K; Duyck J
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):566-73. PubMed ID: 21209995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Occlusal forces and chewing ability in dentitions with cross-arch bridges.
Laurell L
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1985; 26():160p.. PubMed ID: 3901379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Three-dimensional force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures.
Mericske-Stern R; Geering AH; Burgin WB; Graf H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(2):185-94. PubMed ID: 1398835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Influence of the connector and implant design on the implant-tooth-connected prostheses.
Da Silva EF; Pellizzer EP; Quinelli Mazaro JV; Garcia Júnior IR
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 19438943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Freestanding and tooth-implant connected prostheses in the treatment of partially edentulous patients Part II: An up to 15-years radiographic evaluation.
Naert IE; Duyck JA; Hosny MM; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Jun; 12(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 11359482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. The influence of cantilever length and implant inclination on stress distribution in maxillary implant-supported fixed dentures.
Bevilacqua M; Tealdo T; Menini M; Pera F; Mossolov A; Drago C; Pera P
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jan; 105(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 21194582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Load transmission in implant superstructures supported by natural teeth and osseointegrated dental implants. A preliminary report.
Hobkirk JA; Tanner SR
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Mar; 3(3):101-5. PubMed ID: 8603151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Distribution of load in an oral prosthesis system: an in vitro study.
Patterson EA; Burguete RL; Thoi MH; Johns RB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(5):552-60. PubMed ID: 7590999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The influence of occlusal surface material on peak masticatory forces using osseointegrated implant-supported prostheses.
Hobkirk JA; Psarros KJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 1289260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Occlusal force pattern during mastication in dentitions with mandibular fixed partial dentures supported on osseointegrated implants.
Lundgren D; Laurell L; Falk H; Bergendal T
J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Aug; 58(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 3476727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. The use of attachments in combination implant and natural-tooth fixed partial dentures: a technical report.
Cohen SR; Orenstein JH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1994; 9(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 8206560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Comparative evaluation of chewing function with removable partial dentures and fixed prostheses supported by the single-crystal sapphire implant in the Kennedy Class II partially edentulous mandible.
Akagawa Y; Okane H; Kondo N; Tsuga K; Tsuru H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 2639121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Qualitative evaluation of the masseteric poststimulus EMG complex following mechanical or acoustic stimulation of osseointegrated oral implants.
Jacobs R; van Steenberghe D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 7744436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Influence of number and distribution of occlusal cantilever contacts on closing and chewing forces in dentitions with implant-supported fixed prostheses occluding with complete dentures.
Lundgren D; Falk H; Laurell L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(4):277-83. PubMed ID: 2639855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. An In Vivo Study on Load Distribution in Different Implant Configurations for Supporting Fixed Partial Dentures.
Kobari H; Yoda N; Chen J; Kawata T; Sasaki K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1049-57. PubMed ID: 27632259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone.
Iplikçioğlu H; Akça K
J Dent; 2002 Jan; 30(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11741734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of a shotgun injury: a patient report.
Torabi K; Ahangari AH; Vojdani M; Fattahi F
J Prosthodont; 2010 Dec; 19(8):634-8. PubMed ID: 21054639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
