These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9197100)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with dental implants: a clinical report.
    Devge C; Tjellström A; Nellström H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(3):354-9. PubMed ID: 9197100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts.
    Starcuková J; Starcuk Z; Hubálková H; Linetskiy I
    Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 17884157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implant-supported fixed partial prostheses: a retrospective study.
    Johansson LA; Ekfeldt A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 12737250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the spine with metal implants. General safety and superior imaging with titanium.
    Rupp R; Ebraheim NA; Savolaine ER; Jackson WT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Mar; 18(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 8475442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Postimplantation MRI with cylindric and cubic intervertebral test implants: evaluation of implant shape, material, and volume in MRI artifacting--an in vitro study.
    Ernstberger T; Heidrich G; Buchhorn G
    Spine J; 2007; 7(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 17482121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: 6-month fatigue retention values.
    Doukas D; Michelinakis G; Smith PW; Barclay CW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 18546771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Artifacts induced by dental reconstruction materials: the case of titanium].
    Savane S; N'Dindin AC; N'Dindin GB; Kouame PA; Doyon D
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2001 Sep; 24(95):33-7. PubMed ID: 11808373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tooth- and implant-supported prostheses: a retrospective clinical follow-up up to 8 years.
    Kindberg H; Gunne J; Kronström M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12066706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of interface relationships between implant components for laser-welded titanium frameworks and standard cast frameworks.
    Rubenstein JE; Ma T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):491-5. PubMed ID: 10453662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Hubálková H; Hora K; Seidl Z; Krásenský J
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Sep; 10(3):125-30. PubMed ID: 12382608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical experiences with laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible: a 10-year follow-up study.
    Ortorp A; Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(4):198-209. PubMed ID: 17100745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
    Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laser-welded titanium frameworks for implant-supported fixed prostheses: a 5-year report.
    Bergendal B; Palmqvist S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 10074754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Artifacts from dental metal alloys in magnetic resonance imaging].
    Cao Z; Chen LL; Gong XY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(26):1855-8. PubMed ID: 19040024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implant treatment in the edentulous maxillae: a 15-year follow-up study on 76 consecutive patients provided with fixed prostheses.
    Jemt T; Johansson J
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(2):61-9. PubMed ID: 16774591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of abutment's height and framework alloy on the load distribution of mandibular cantilevered implant-supported prosthesis.
    Suedam V; Souza EA; Moura MS; Jacques LB; Rubo JH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):196-200. PubMed ID: 19191796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dental implants as strategic supplementary abutments for implant-tooth-supported telescopic crown-retained maxillary dentures: a retrospective follow-up study for up to 9 years.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Waldenberger O; Piehslinger E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):617-22. PubMed ID: 18069371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Single tooth replacement by Morse taper connection implants: a retrospective study of 80 implants.
    Mangano C; Bartolucci EG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):675-80. PubMed ID: 11669250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.