These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9197450)

  • 21. Analysis of the success rates of Burch colposuspension in relation to Valsalva leak-point pressure.
    Bai SW; Park JH; Kim SK; Park KH
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Mar; 50(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 15841931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Prolene mesh sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Integral treatment of pelvic floor anomalies. Long-term results].
    Romero Maroto J; Prieto Chaparro L; López López C; Quilez Fenoll JM; Bolufer Nadal S
    Arch Esp Urol; 2002 Nov; 55(9):1057-74. PubMed ID: 12564066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can we predict urinary stress incontinence by using demographic, clinical, imaging and urodynamic data?
    Wlaźlak E; Surkont G; Shek KL; Dietz HP
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():114-7. PubMed ID: 26291686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Diagnosis and management in women with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after burch colposuspension].
    Feyereisl J; Krofta L
    Ceska Gynekol; 2011 Dec; 76(6):425-38. PubMed ID: 22312836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Effectiveness of Burch colposuspension in females with recurrent stress incontinence--a urodynamic and ultrasound study].
    Enzelsberger H; Kurz C; Adler A; Schatten C
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1991 Nov; 51(11):915-9. PubMed ID: 1773927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Feasibility of and interest in laparoscopic assessment in recurrent urinary stress incontinence after Burch procedure performed by laparotomy.
    von Theobald P; Barjot P; Lévy G
    Surg Endosc; 1997 May; 11(5):468-71. PubMed ID: 9153177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Detrusor instability--an important but underestimated factor in urinary incontinence in women].
    Dimitrov R; Doganov N
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1998; 37(3):23-6. PubMed ID: 10204261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A three-armed randomized trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using sutures and laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence.
    Ankardal M; Milsom I; Stjerndahl JH; Engh ME
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):773-9. PubMed ID: 16026404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Randomised comparison of Burch colposuspension versus anterior colporrhaphy in women with stress urinary incontinence and anterior vaginal wall prolapse.
    Colombo M; Vitobello D; Proietti F; Milani R
    BJOG; 2000 Apr; 107(4):544-51. PubMed ID: 10759276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Burch colposuspension vs. Stamey bladder neck suspension. A comparison of complications with special emphasis on detrusor instability and voiding dysfunction.
    Wang AC
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Jul; 41(7):529-33. PubMed ID: 8829067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multichannel urodynamic evaluation of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for genuine stress incontinence.
    Ross JW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan; 91(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 9464721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
    Lapitan MC; Cody DJ; Grant AM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2003; (1):CD002912. PubMed ID: 12535443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Suture injury to the urinary tract in urethral suspension procedures for stress incontinence.
    Dwyer PL; Carey MP; Rosamilia A
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 1999; 10(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 10207762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Recurrence rate following surgery of incontinence in patients with hypotonic urethra].
    Wolf H; von Coburg P; Maass H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1989 Oct; 49(10):865-71. PubMed ID: 2583429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Recommendations for the urodynamic examination in the investigation of non-neurological female urinary incontinence].
    Hermieu JF;
    Prog Urol; 2007 Nov; 17(6 Suppl 2):1264-84. PubMed ID: 18214138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of urodynamic parameters following Burch colposuspension.
    Athanassopoulos A; Melekos M; Perimenis P; Markou S; Speakman M; Barbalias G
    Urol Int; 1994; 53(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 7645143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical and urodynamic features of failed incontinence surgery in the female.
    Stanton SL; Cardozo L; Williams JE; Ritchie D; Allan V
    Obstet Gynecol; 1978 May; 51(5):515-20. PubMed ID: 652197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Voiding function after Burch colposuspension for stress incontinence.
    Wall LL; Hewitt JK
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Mar; 41(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 8778413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A clinical and urodynamic assessment of the Burch colposuspension for genuine stress incontinence.
    Hilton P; Stanton SL
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Oct; 90(10):934-9. PubMed ID: 6684950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Urodynamic measures do not predict stress continence outcomes after surgery for stress urinary incontinence in selected women.
    Nager CW; FitzGerald M; Kraus SR; Chai TC; Zyczynski H; Sirls L; Lemack GE; Lloyd LK; Litman HJ; Stoddard AM; Baker J; Steers W;
    J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1470-4. PubMed ID: 18295276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.