These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9198432)

  • 1. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on post removal in extracted human premolar teeth.
    Johnson WT; Leary JM; Boyer DB
    J Endod; 1996 Sep; 22(9):487-8. PubMed ID: 9198432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of several protocols for the application of ultrasound during the removal of cast intraradicular posts cemented with zinc phosphate cement.
    Garrido AD; Oliveira AG; Osório JE; Silva-Sousa YT; Sousa-Neto MD
    Int Endod J; 2009 Jul; 42(7):609-13. PubMed ID: 19467051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of two ultrasonic instruments for post removal.
    Dixon EB; Kaczkowski PJ; Nicholls JI; Harrington GW
    J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 11833682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on the retention of adhesively luted intra-radicular posts.
    Satterthwaite JD; Stokes AN
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Sep; 12(3):101-4. PubMed ID: 15521391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of ultrasonic and sonic instruments for intraradicular post removal.
    Buoncristiani J; Seto BG; Caputo AA
    J Endod; 1994 Oct; 20(10):486-9. PubMed ID: 7714420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two methods for the removal of root canal posts.
    Chandler NP; Qualtrough AJ; Purton DG
    Quintessence Int; 2003; 34(7):534-6. PubMed ID: 12946072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length.
    Nissan J; Dmitry Y; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 11552168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of ultrasound, with and without water spray cooling, on removal of posts cemented with resin or zinc phosphate cements.
    Garrido AD; Fonseca TS; Alfredo E; Silva-Sousa YT; Sousa-Neto MD
    J Endod; 2004 Mar; 30(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15055437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of timing of coronal preparation on retention of cemented cast posts and cores.
    Al-Ali K; Talic Y; Abduljabbar T; Omar R
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 12854794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An experimental study of the removal of cemented dowel-retained cast cores by ultrasonic vibration.
    Yoshida T; Gomyo S; Itoh T; Shibata T; Sekine I
    J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):239-41. PubMed ID: 9594774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system.
    D'Arcangelo C; Cinelli M; De Angelis F; D'Amario M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 17854620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of the shape core on custom cast dowel and core removal by ultrasonic energy.
    Queiroz EC; Menezes MS; Biffi JC; Soares CJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 34(6):463-7. PubMed ID: 17518982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of a Cavity to Optimize Ultrasonic Efficiency to Remove Intraradicular Posts.
    Graça IAA; Sponchiado Júnior EC; Marques AAF; de Moura Martins L; Garrido ÂDB
    J Endod; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1350-1353. PubMed ID: 28578894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the efficiency and effectiveness of various techniques for removal of fiber posts.
    Lindemann M; Yaman P; Dennison JB; Herrero AA
    J Endod; 2005 Jul; 31(7):520-2. PubMed ID: 15980712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Removal time of fiber posts versus titanium posts.
    Frazer RQ; Kovarik RE; Chance KB; Mitchell RJ
    Am J Dent; 2008 Jun; 21(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 18686770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of different ultrasonic vibration modes for post removal.
    Braga NM; Silva JM; Carvalho-Júnior JR; Ferreira RC; Saquy PC; Brito-Júnior M
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 22460315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two techniques for removing fiber posts.
    Gesi A; Magnolfi S; Goracci C; Ferrari M
    J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):580-2. PubMed ID: 14503831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention of posts luted with phosphate monomer-based composite cement in canals obturated using a eugenol sealer.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):378-82. PubMed ID: 12691274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
    Schmage P; Sohn J; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.