These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9198720)

  • 41. Wood dust: an occupational hazard which increases the risk of respiratory disease.
    Baran S; Teul I
    J Physiol Pharmacol; 2007 Nov; 58 Suppl 5(Pt 1):43-50. PubMed ID: 18204114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Rules and recent trends for setting health-based occupational exposure limits for chemicals.
    Skowroń J; Czerczak S
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2015; 28(2):243-52. PubMed ID: 26182920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reassessment of occupational exposure limits.
    Stouten H; Ott H; Bouwman C; Wardenbach P
    Am J Ind Med; 2008 Jun; 51(6):407-18. PubMed ID: 18409185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A probabilistic effect assessment model for hazardous substances at the workplace.
    Schneider K; Schuhmacher-Wolz U; Hassauer M; Darschnik S; Elmshäuser E; Mosbach-Schulz O
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Mar; 44(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 16356615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Public health guidance values for chemical mixtures: current practice and future directions.
    Pohl HR; Hansen H; Chou CH
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Dec; 26(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 9441922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Principles of risk assessment for determining the safety of chemicals: recent assessment of residual solvents in drugs and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate.
    Hasegawa R; Koizumi M; Hirose A
    Congenit Anom (Kyoto); 2004 Jun; 44(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 15198717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. RD50 value as the criterion for setting maximum admissible levels of occupational exposure to irritants in Poland.
    Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Soćko R; Czerczak S
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2006; 12(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 16554003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Toxicology primer: understanding workplace hazards and protecting worker health.
    Arble J
    AAOHN J; 2004 Jun; 52(6):254-61; quiz 262-3. PubMed ID: 15219112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Occupational exposure of medical personnel to chemical factors affecting fertility].
    Sitarek K; Berlińska B
    Med Pr; 1997; 48(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 9273444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Emergency exposure limits: a guide to quality assurance and safety.
    Woudenberg F; van der Torn P
    Qual Assur; 1992 Oct; 1(4):249-93. PubMed ID: 1344216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Adverse effects as a human toxicological problem].
    Schimmelpfennig W
    Schriftenr Ver Wasser Boden Lufthyg; 1999; 103():108-38. PubMed ID: 10719708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Estimation of chemical hazards in breast milk.
    Poitrast BJ; Keller WC; Elves RG
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1988 Nov; 59(11 Pt 2):A87-92. PubMed ID: 3202809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. New developments in exposure assessment: the impact on the practice of health risk assessment and epidemiological studies.
    Nieuwenhuijsen M; Paustenbach D; Duarte-Davidson R
    Environ Int; 2006 Dec; 32(8):996-1009. PubMed ID: 16875734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Setting limit values for chemical substances in the workplace: DNEL(INH) setting according to REACH principles following the example of 2-butyne-1,4-diol].
    Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Swiercz R
    Med Pr; 2009; 60(5):347-57. PubMed ID: 19999038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Occupational hazard evaluation of working population in a select automotive industrial plant.
    Wójcik A; Borzecki Z; Kowalska E; Borzecki A
    Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med; 2004; 59(1):330-4. PubMed ID: 16146007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Background on the system of integral evaluation of human exposure to toxic substances in the work and municipal environments.
    Dutkiewicz T; Kończalik J
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 1999; 12(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 10581867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Comparative evaluation of maximum allowable exposure level of hazardous substances in the air of the working area established in China, Russia and USA].
    Gén-lin S
    Med Tr Prom Ekol; 1994; (1):21-6. PubMed ID: 7804709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Knowledge of selected occupational groups about biological agents in the environment and ways of health protection against occupational exposure to biological hazards].
    Zielińska-Jankiewicz K; Kozajda A
    Med Pr; 2003; 54(5):399-406. PubMed ID: 14978888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Stoffenmanager exposure model: development of a quantitative algorithm.
    Tielemans E; Noy D; Schinkel J; Heussen H; Van Der Schaaf D; West J; Fransman W
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2008 Aug; 52(6):443-54. PubMed ID: 18621742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The utility of PBPK in the safety assessment of chloroform and carbon tetrachloride.
    Delic JI; Lilly PD; MacDonald AJ; Loizou GD
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2000 Oct; 32(2):144-55. PubMed ID: 11067771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.