These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 919877)

  • 1. [Diagnostic conization of the uterine cervix. II. Comparison of histological diagnoses with cytological and colposcopic tentative diagnoses].
    Geissler U
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1977; 99(17):1028-32. PubMed ID: 919877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Diagnostic conization of the uterine cervix. I. Classification of histological diagnoses].
    Geissler U
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1977; 99(17):1025-7. PubMed ID: 919876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cytology and colposcopy in the diagnosis and management of outpatients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Allahverdian V; Valaitis J; Kalis O; Pearlman S
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Jan; 24(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 7359496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The combined use of cytology and colposcopy in enhancing diagnostic accuracy in preclinical lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Lozowski MS; Mishriki Y; Talebian F; Solitare G
    Acta Cytol; 1982; 26(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 6954809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of colposcopy directed biopsies and cold knife conization in patients with abnormal cytology.
    Hovadhanakul P; Mehra U; Terragno A; Taylor HB; Cavanagh D
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1976 Mar; 142(3):333-6. PubMed ID: 1251312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison between colposcopic and cytologic findings in relation to clinical and histologic diagnoses in carcinoma in situ].
    Könnecke J; Wagner F; Marzotko F; Fröde R; Sommer J
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1983; 105(9):573-7. PubMed ID: 6880473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Colposcopic evaluation of patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
    Talebian F; Shayan A; Krumholz BA; Palladino VS; Mann LI
    Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Jun; 49(6):670-4. PubMed ID: 865729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of colposcopic accuracy in diagnosis of cervical neoplasia.
    Srisomboon J; Tangchaitrong CA; Bhusawang Y; Chairatana A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1996 Jul; 79(7):423-8. PubMed ID: 8855620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia as determined by cytology and colposcopic biopsy.
    Bamford PN; Beilby JO; Steele SJ; Vlies R
    Acta Cytol; 1983; 27(5):482-4. PubMed ID: 6578644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative colposcopic, cytological and histological studies of the uterine cervix during pregnancy].
    Scharnke HD; Jorde A; Peschel HG; Sielaff E
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1976; 98(25):1547-52. PubMed ID: 1020511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. False-negative Papanicolaou smears from women with cancerous and precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Pairwuti S
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 1994633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
    Economos K; Perez Veridiano N; Delke I; Collado ML; Tancer ML
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Colposcopic management of abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy.
    LaPolla JP; O'Neill C; Wetrich D
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Mar; 33(3):301-6. PubMed ID: 3361522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Management of abnormal Papanicolaou smears in pregnancy.
    Lurain JR; Gallup DG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Apr; 53(4):484-8. PubMed ID: 440652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Preoperative evaluation by colposcopy and cytology in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (cin) (author's transl)].
    Naujoks H; Köpf F; Leber I
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1979 May; 39(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 456858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The value of endocervical curettage as part of the standard colposcopic evaluation.
    Granai CO; Jelen I; Louis F; Kawada CY; Curry SL
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):373-5. PubMed ID: 4009557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear?
    Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Colposcopic evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Cruikshank DP; Kaminsky DB; Ekbladh LE
    J Reprod Med; 1976 Dec; 17(6):327-30. PubMed ID: 1003398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Role of endocervical curettage in colposcopy.
    Hatch KD; Shingleton HM; Orr JW; Gore H; Soong SJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 3974966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.