BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9199519)

  • 1. Latency of contralateral sound-evoked auditory efferent suppression of otoacoustic emissions.
    Hill JC; Prasher DK; Luxon LM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 May; 117(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9199519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efferent-mediated reduction in cochlear gain does not alter tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission group delays.
    Bhagat SP; Kilgore C
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Jan; 559():132-5. PubMed ID: 24333175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medial olivo-cochlear system and tinnitus.
    Chéry-Croze S; Collet L; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1993 May; 113(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 8517129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A nicotinic-like receptor mediates suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions by contralateral sound.
    Kujawa SG; Glattke TJ; Fallon M; Bobbin RP
    Hear Res; 1994 Apr; 74(1-2):122-34. PubMed ID: 8040083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Exploration of the efferent system in man: basic and clinical results].
    Chery Croze S; Veuillet E; Collet L; Morgon A
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1993; 114(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 8284551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of evoking stimulus level on the neural suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Ryan S; Kemp DT
    Hear Res; 1996 May; 94(1-2):140-7. PubMed ID: 8789819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of olivocochlear bundle section on otoacoustic emissions in humans: efferent effects in comparison with control subjects.
    Williams EA; Brookes GB; Prasher DK
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Mar; 114(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 8203191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Olivocochlear efferent vs. middle-ear contributions to the alteration of otoacoustic emissions by contralateral noise.
    Büki B; Wit HP; Avan P
    Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 852(1):140-50. PubMed ID: 10661505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contralateral acoustic suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions--activation of the medial olivocochlear system.
    Komazec Z; Filipović D; Milosević D
    Med Pregl; 2003; 56(3-4):124-30. PubMed ID: 12899075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contralaterally evoked transient otoacoustic emissions.
    Pratt H; Shi Y; Polyakov A
    Hear Res; 1998 Jan; 115(1-2):39-44. PubMed ID: 9472734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Suppression of otoacoustic emission is unchanged after several minutes of contralateral acoustic stimulation.
    Giraud AL; Collet L; Chéry-Croze S
    Hear Res; 1997 Jul; 109(1-2):78-82. PubMed ID: 9259237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) on acoustic distortion product input/output functions: does the medial efferent system act differently in the vicinity of an SOAE?
    Moulin A; Collet L; Morgon A
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992; 112(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 1604981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrically Evoked Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Effects on Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions in Guinea Pigs.
    Berezina-Greene MA; Guinan JJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):153-163. PubMed ID: 27798720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medial olivocochlear suppression in musicians versus non-musicians.
    Bulut E; Öztürk G; Taş M; Türkmen MT; Gülmez ZD; Öztürk L
    Physiol Int; 2019 Jun; 106(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 31262207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence of the contralateral acoustic stimulation on the acoustic otoemissions: response modulation by the efferent olivocochlear system].
    Morant Ventura A; Marco Algarra J; Caballero Mallea J; Orts Alborch M; Sequi Canet JM; Mir Planas B
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1992; 43(5):307-10. PubMed ID: 1492986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Activation of medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans: influence of stimulus bandwidth.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Andéol G; Gallégo S; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2000 Feb; 140(1-2):111-25. PubMed ID: 10675639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for efferent effects on auditory afferent activity, and their functional relevance.
    Hill JC; Prasher DK; Luxon LM
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1997 Oct; 22(5):394-402. PubMed ID: 9372248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subclinical dysfunction of cochlea and cochlear efferents in migraine: an otoacoustic emission study.
    Bolay H; Bayazit YA; Gündüz B; Ugur AK; Akçali D; Altunyay S; Ilica S; Babacan A
    Cephalalgia; 2008 Apr; 28(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 18279433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Slow build-up of cochlear suppression during sustained contralateral noise: central modulation of olivocochlear efferents?
    Larsen E; Liberman MC
    Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):1-10. PubMed ID: 19232534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Easy and Hard Auditory Tasks Distinguished by Otoacoustic Emissions and Event-related Potentials: Insights into Efferent System Activity.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Milner R; Pilka E; Ganc M; Skarzynski H
    Neuroscience; 2022 May; 491():87-97. PubMed ID: 35398177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.