These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9200061)

  • 1. General practitioner based screening for cervical cancer: higher participation of women with a higher risk?
    Kant AC; Palm BT; Wentink E; van Weel C
    J Med Screen; 1997; 4(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 9200061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preliminary results of a general practice based call system for cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands.
    Palm BT; Kant AC; van den Bosch WJ; Vooijs GP; van Weel C
    Br J Gen Pract; 1993 Dec; 43(377):503-6. PubMed ID: 8312021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance].
    de Nooijer DP; de Waart FG; van Leeuwen AW; Spijker WW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Oct; 149(42):2339-43. PubMed ID: 16261714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
    Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
    Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attendance to cervical cancer screening in family practices in The Netherlands.
    Hermens RP; Tacken MA; Hulscher ME; Braspenning JC; Grol RP
    Prev Med; 2000 Jan; 30(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10642458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preliminary results of a district call scheme for cervical screening organised in general practice.
    Havelock CM; Webb J; Queenborough J
    BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6660):1384-6. PubMed ID: 3146374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective study of predictors of attendance for breast screening in inner London.
    Sutton S; Bickler G; Sancho-Aldridge J; Saidi G
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1994 Feb; 48(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 8138773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A primary healthcare-based intervention to improve a Danish cervical cancer screening programme: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
    Jensen H; Svanholm H; Støvring H; Bro F
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2009 Jul; 63(7):510-5. PubMed ID: 19228681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Promoting participation in a population screening program for breast and cervical cancer: a randomized trial of different invitation strategies.
    Segnan N; Senore C; Giordano L; Ponti A; Ronco G
    Tumori; 1998; 84(3):348-53. PubMed ID: 9678615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motivators for women to attend cervical screening: the influential role of GPs.
    O'Connor M; Murphy J; Martin C; O'Leary J; Sharp L;
    Fam Pract; 2014 Aug; 31(4):475-82. PubMed ID: 24927724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical screening in general practice: call and recall.
    Ridsdale LL
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Jun; 37(299):257-9. PubMed ID: 3129556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving uptake of cervical cancer screening in women with prolonged history of non-attendance for screening: a randomized trial of enhanced invitation methods.
    Stein K; Lewendon G; Jenkins R; Davis C
    J Med Screen; 2005; 12(4):185-9. PubMed ID: 16417695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating the decrease in participation in the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: The role of personal and organisational characteristics.
    Aitken CA; Kaljouw S; Siebers AG; Bron M; Morssink A; van Kemenade FJ; de Kok IMCM
    Prev Med Rep; 2021 Jun; 22():101328. PubMed ID: 33680719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Participation in screening for colorectal cancer based on a faecal occult blood test is improved by endorsement by the primary care practitioner.
    Cole SR; Young GP; Byrne D; Guy JR; Morcom J
    J Med Screen; 2002; 9(4):147-52. PubMed ID: 12518003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Invitation to cervical cancer screening does increase participation in Germany: Results from the MARZY study.
    Radde K; Gottschalk A; Bussas U; Schülein S; Schriefer D; Seifert U; Neumann A; Kaiser M; Blettner M; Klug SJ
    Int J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 139(5):1018-30. PubMed ID: 27083776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Breast, cervical and colo-rectal simultaneous mass screening program for women 50 to 69 years old in Isere].
    Garnier A; Exbrayat C; Marron J; Seigneurin D; Winckel P; Bolla M
    Sante Publique; 2000 May; 12 Spec No():59-69. PubMed ID: 10989629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uptake of cervical screening in general practice: effect of practice organisation, structure, and deprivation.
    Ibbotson T; Wyke S; McEwen J; Macintyre S; Kelly M
    J Med Screen; 1996; 3(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8861049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health authority cervical screening recall policies and time since last smear: a retrospective cohort analysis in the north west England.
    Howe A; Owen-Smith V; Richardson J
    J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 14746327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Women's lay knowledge of cervical cancer/cervical screening: accounting for non-attendance at cervical screening clinics.
    Neilson A; Jones RK
    J Adv Nurs; 1998 Sep; 28(3):571-5. PubMed ID: 9756225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer.
    Austoker J
    BMJ; 1994 Jul; 309(6949):241-8. PubMed ID: 7980803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.