203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9200062)
1. Changing incidence of invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in East Anglia.
Stockton D; Cooper P; Lonsdale RN
J Med Screen; 1997; 4(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 9200062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in cancer of the cervix uteri in Sweden following cytological screening.
Bergström R; Sparén P; Adami HO
Br J Cancer; 1999 Sep; 81(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 10487628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma incidence trends among Tunisian women.
Missaoui N; Trabelsi A; Landolsi H; Jaidaine L; Mokni M; Korbi S; Hmissa S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2010; 11(3):777-80. PubMed ID: 21039053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The rising incidence of adenocarcinoma relative to squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix in the United States--a 24-year population-based study.
Smith HO; Tiffany MF; Qualls CR; Key CR
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Aug; 78(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 10926787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of mass screening on incidence and mortality of squamous and adenocarcinoma of cervix uteri.
Nieminen P; Kallio M; Hakama M
Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 85(6):1017-21. PubMed ID: 7770247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The changing pattern of cervical cancer in Northern Ireland 1965-1989.
Robertson JH; Woodend B
Ulster Med J; 1992 Apr; 61(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 1621297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in invasive cervical cancer incidence in East Anglia from 1971 to 1993.
Gibson L; Spiegelhalter DJ; Camilleri-Ferrante C; Day NE
J Med Screen; 1997; 4(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 9200063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening and adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
Sasieni P; Castanon A; Cuzick J
Int J Cancer; 2009 Aug; 125(3):525-9. PubMed ID: 19449379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Etiologic heterogeneity for cervical carcinoma by histopathologic type, using comparative age-period-cohort models.
Reimers LL; Anderson WF; Rosenberg PS; Henson DE; Castle PE
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Mar; 18(3):792-800. PubMed ID: 19258470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Changing rates of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix in England.
Sasieni P; Adams J
Lancet; 2001 May; 357(9267):1490-3. PubMed ID: 11377601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical cancer in Canada: changing patterns in incidence and mortality.
Liu S; Semenciw R; Probert A; Mao Y
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2001; 11(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 11285030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A longitudinal Swedish study on screening for squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: evidence of effectiveness and overtreatment.
Gunnell AS; Ylitalo N; Sandin S; Sparén P; Adami HO; Ripatti S
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2641-8. PubMed ID: 18086769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical cancer prevented by screening: Long-term incidence trends by morphology in Norway.
Lönnberg S; Hansen BT; Haldorsen T; Campbell S; Schee K; Nygård M
Int J Cancer; 2015 Oct; 137(7):1758-64. PubMed ID: 25833121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix compared with squamous cell carcinoma: a 12-year study in Southampton and South-west Hampshire.
Herbert A; Singh N; Smith JA
Cytopathology; 2001 Feb; 12(1):26-36. PubMed ID: 11256934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cervical cancer in the Netherlands 1989-1998: Decrease of squamous cell carcinoma in older women, increase of adenocarcinoma in younger women.
Bulk S; Visser O; Rozendaal L; Verheijen RH; Meijer CJ
Int J Cancer; 2005 Mar; 113(6):1005-9. PubMed ID: 15515017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Changes in cervical cancer incidence after three decades of screening US women less than 30 years old.
Chan PG; Sung HY; Sawaya GF
Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Oct; 102(4):765-73. PubMed ID: 14551007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cancer of the uterine cervix in Norway by histologic type, 1970-84.
Eide TJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1987 Aug; 79(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 3474452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mass screening programmes and trends in cervical cancer in Finland and the Netherlands.
van der Aa MA; Pukkala E; Coebergh JW; Anttila A; Siesling S
Int J Cancer; 2008 Apr; 122(8):1854-8. PubMed ID: 18067129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Invasive cervical cancer in Southampton and South West Hampshire: effect of introducing a comprehensive screening programme.
Herbert A; Breen C; Bryant TN; Hitchcock A; Macdonald H; Millward-Sadler GH; Smith J
J Med Screen; 1996; 3(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 8861047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incidence trends of adenocarcinoma of the cervix in 13 European countries.
Bray F; Carstensen B; Møller H; Zappa M; Zakelj MP; Lawrence G; Hakama M; Weiderpass E
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Sep; 14(9):2191-9. PubMed ID: 16172231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
