BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9200063)

  • 1. Trends in invasive cervical cancer incidence in East Anglia from 1971 to 1993.
    Gibson L; Spiegelhalter DJ; Camilleri-Ferrante C; Day NE
    J Med Screen; 1997; 4(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 9200063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changing incidence of invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in East Anglia.
    Stockton D; Cooper P; Lonsdale RN
    J Med Screen; 1997; 4(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 9200062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trends in incidence of and mortality from invasive cancer of the uterine cervix in Scotland (1975-1994).
    Walker JJ; Brewster D; Gould A; Raab GM
    Public Health; 1998 Nov; 112(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 9883033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Population-based Study of Invasive Cervical Cancer Patients in Beijing: 1993-2008.
    Wang T; Wu MH; Wu YM; Zhang WY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Dec; 128(24):3298-304. PubMed ID: 26668143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The pattern of presentation of carcinoma of the uterine cervix in East Anglia 1960 to 1975.
    de Bono AM; Pillers EM; Kirk NM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1978 Dec; 85(12):887-92. PubMed ID: 737154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does lowering the screening age for cervical cancer in The Netherlands make sense?
    van der Aa MA; de Kok IM; Siesling S; van Ballegooijen M; Coebergh JW
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Sep; 123(6):1403-6. PubMed ID: 18566998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of cervical screening history data to interpret cervical cancer incidence trends.
    Clare J; Edwards D; Bagnall H; Pearmain P; Lawrence G
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2008 Jun; 30(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 18296455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of the Australian National Cervical Screening Program in women of different ages.
    Smith M; Canfell K
    Med J Aust; 2016 Oct; 205(8):359-364. PubMed ID: 27736623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
    Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
    J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of a mass screening program on the risk of cervical cancer.
    Louhivuori K
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1991; 15(6):471-5. PubMed ID: 1782637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The impact of a two- versus three-yearly cervical screening interval recommendation on cervical cancer incidence and mortality: an analysis of trends in Australia, New Zealand, and England.
    Simonella L; Canfell K
    Cancer Causes Control; 2013 Sep; 24(9):1727-36. PubMed ID: 23832659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonattendance is still the main limitation for the effectiveness of screening for cervical cancer in the Netherlands.
    Bos AB; Rebolj M; Habbema JD; van Ballegooijen M
    Int J Cancer; 2006 Nov; 119(10):2372-5. PubMed ID: 16858676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.
    Day NE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 6717876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Invasive cervical cancer in Southampton and South West Hampshire: effect of introducing a comprehensive screening programme.
    Herbert A; Breen C; Bryant TN; Hitchcock A; Macdonald H; Millward-Sadler GH; Smith J
    J Med Screen; 1996; 3(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 8861047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cervical cancer after 10 years of nationally coordinated screening].
    Haldorsen T; Skare GB; Steen R; Thoresen SO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2008 Mar; 128(6):682-5. PubMed ID: 18337847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variation in incidence of breast, lung and cervical cancer and malignant melanoma of skin by socioeconomic group in England.
    Shack L; Jordan C; Thomson CS; Mak V; Møller H;
    BMC Cancer; 2008 Sep; 8():271. PubMed ID: 18822122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical cancer in Croatia: state of the art and possibilities for prevention.
    Znaor A; Strnad M
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():37-40. PubMed ID: 17598503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cervical cancer.
    Beral V; Hermon C; Muñoz N; Devesa SS
    Cancer Surv; 1994; 19-20():265-85. PubMed ID: 7534630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical cancer in New Zealand: national and regional trends.
    Cox B; Borman B
    N Z Med J; 1994 Aug; 107(984):323-6. PubMed ID: 8072727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.