544 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9200199)
1. An in vitro comparison of four surface preparation techniques for veneering a compomer to stainless steel.
Salama FS; el-Mallakh BF
Pediatr Dent; 1997; 19(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 9200199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Shear peel bond strength of compomers veneered to amalgam.
Al-Jazairy YH
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):396-400. PubMed ID: 11319538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shear bond strength of Dyract compomer material to dentin of primary molars.
Megid FY; Salama FS
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):305-10. PubMed ID: 9484116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Shear bond strength of brackets bonded to amalgam with different intermediate resins and adhesives.
Germec D; Cakan U; Ozdemir FI; Arun T; Cakan M
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 19073953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bond strengths of composite resin and compomers in primary and permanent teeth.
Jumlongras D; White GE
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 9484131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of shear and flexural bond strength tests versus failure modes of dentin bonding systems.
Dunn WJ; Söderholm KJ
Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):297-303. PubMed ID: 11803994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dentine bond strength and microleakage of flowable composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
Xie H; Zhang F; Wu Y; Chen C; Liu W
Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19133948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dentin bond strength of fluoride-releasing materials.
Triana R; Prado C; Garro J; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 1994 Oct; 7(5):252-4. PubMed ID: 7986447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laboratory evaluation of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for orthodontic bonding.
Millett DT; Cattanach D; McFadzean R; Pattison J; McColl J
Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):58-63; discussion 64. PubMed ID: 10022186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enhanced bond strengths of compomers using two dentin bonding systems.
Somphone P; Pereira PN; Nikaido T; Tagami J
Am J Dent; 2002 Oct; 15(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 12537344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
Owens BM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material.
Akgungor G; Sen D; Aydin M
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):388-99. PubMed ID: 18456050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of amalgam surface preparation on the shear bond strength between composite and amalgam.
Ruse ND; Sekimoto RT; Feduik D
Oper Dent; 1995; 20(5):180-5. PubMed ID: 8710696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of different bonding conditions on the shear bond strength of two compomers to bovine dentin.
Al-Nahedh H; Ateyah NZ
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):9-16. PubMed ID: 16957786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of different adhesive primers on the bond strength between an indirect composite resin and a base metal alloy.
Sarafianou A; Seimenis I; Papadopoulos T
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):377-87. PubMed ID: 18456049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of compomers to human primary and permanent enamel.
Cehreli ZC; Usmen E
Am J Dent; 1999 Feb; 12(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 10477995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal adaptation of resin-bonded light-cured glass ionomers in dentin cavities.
Fritz UB; Finger WJ; Uno S
Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 9545879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of zirconium-oxide ceramic surface treatments on the bond strength to adhesive resin.
Atsu SS; Kilicarslan MA; Kucukesmen HC; Aka PS
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):430-6. PubMed ID: 16765155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
Hannig M; Friedrichs C
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
