120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9201237)
1. Prognosis of radically operated breast carcinoma patients. A retrospective study of 167 consecutive patients with emphasis on histopathological grading, reproducibility and mean nuclear area.
Raabe NK; Schistad O; Sauer T; Bofin A; Kaaresen R; Fossaa SD
APMIS; 1997 May; 105(5):363-70. PubMed ID: 9201237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does routine grading of invasive lobular cancer of the breast have the same prognostic significance as for ductal cancers?
Sinha PS; Bendall S; Bates T
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2000 Dec; 26(8):733-7. PubMed ID: 11087636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cytopathological grading, as a predictor of histopathological grade, in ductal carcinoma (NOS) of breast, on air-dried Diff-Quik smears.
Khan MZ; Haleem A; Al Hassani H; Kfoury H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Oct; 29(4):185-93. PubMed ID: 14506669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic value of necrosis in Nigerian breast cancer.
Ikpatt O; Ndoma-Egba R; Collan Y
Adv Clin Path; 2002 Jan; 6(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 17582946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic significance of scoring system based on histological heterogeneity of invasive ductal carcinoma for node-negative breast cancer patients.
Kurosumi M; Tabei T; Inoue K; Takei H; Ninomiya J; Naganuma R; Suemasu K; Higashi Y; Tsuchiya E
Oncol Rep; 2003; 10(4):833-7. PubMed ID: 12792731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W
Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A retrospective review with long term follow up of 11,400 cases of pure mucinous breast carcinoma.
Di Saverio S; Gutierrez J; Avisar E
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Oct; 111(3):541-7. PubMed ID: 18026874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of nuclear morphometry of breast cancer in histological sections with clinicopathological features and prognosis.
Abdalla F; Boder J; Markus R; Hashmi H; Buhmeida A; Collan Y
Anticancer Res; 2009 May; 29(5):1771-6. PubMed ID: 19443402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 259 Patients with DCIS of the breast applying USC/Van Nuys prognostic index: a retrospective review with long term follow up.
Di Saverio S; Catena F; Santini D; Ansaloni L; Fogacci T; Mignani S; Leone A; Gazzotti F; Gagliardi S; De Cataldis A; Taffurelli M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Jun; 109(3):405-16. PubMed ID: 17687650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment results and prognostic factors of early breast cancer treated with a breast conserving operation and radiotherapy.
Kim KJ; Huh SJ; Yang JH; Park W; Nam SJ; Kim JH; Lee JH; Kang SS; Lee JE; Kang MK; Park YJ; Nam HR
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2005 Mar; 35(3):126-33. PubMed ID: 15741302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classification and grading of invasive breast carcinoma.
Elston CW
Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol; 2005; 89():35-44. PubMed ID: 18035670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship of clinical and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and outcome of locally advanced breast cancer.
Gajdos C; Tartter PI; Estabrook A; Gistrak MA; Jaffer S; Bleiweiss IJ
J Surg Oncol; 2002 May; 80(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 11967899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vascular grading of angiogenesis: prognostic significance in breast cancer.
Hansen S; Grabau DA; Sørensen FB; Bak M; Vach W; Rose C
Br J Cancer; 2000 Jan; 82(2):339-47. PubMed ID: 10646886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Invasive lobular breast cancer. Prognostic significance of histological malignancy grading.
Talman ML; Jensen MB; Rank F
Acta Oncol; 2007; 46(6):803-9. PubMed ID: 17653904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In lymph node-negative invasive breast carcinomas, specific chromosomal aberrations are strongly associated with high mitotic activity and predict outcome more accurately than grade, tumour diameter, and oestrogen receptor.
Janssen EA; Baak JP; Guervós MA; van Diest PJ; Jiwa M; Hermsen MA
J Pathol; 2003 Dec; 201(4):555-61. PubMed ID: 14648658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ascertaining prognosis for breast cancer in node-negative patients with innovative survival analysis.
Chapman JA; Lickley HL; Trudeau ME; Hanna WM; Kahn HJ; Murray D; Sawka CA; Mobbs BG; McCready DR; Pritchard KI
Breast J; 2006; 12(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 16409585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients.
Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV
Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prognostic value of nuclear grading assessed by image cytometry for node negative breast cancer patients.
Kimijima I; Watanabe T; Abe R
Anticancer Res; 1996; 16(6C):3949-53. PubMed ID: 9042318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node micrometastases.
Gipponi M; Canavese G; Lionetto R; Catturich A; Vecchio C; Sapino A; Friedman D; Cafiero F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 Mar; 32(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 16300921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk-group discrimination in node-negative breast cancer using invasion and proliferation markers: 6-year median follow-up.
Harbeck N; Dettmar P; Thomssen C; Berger U; Ulm K; Kates R; Höfler H; Jänicke F; Graeff H; Schmitt M
Br J Cancer; 1999 May; 80(3-4):419-26. PubMed ID: 10408848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
