These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9201454)
1. Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. III. Factor representation. Divenyi PL; Haupt KM Ear Hear; 1997 Jun; 18(3):189-201. PubMed ID: 9201454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. I. Age and lateral asymmetry effects. Divenyi PL; Haupt KM Ear Hear; 1997 Feb; 18(1):42-61. PubMed ID: 9058037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Audiological correlates of speech understanding deficits in elderly listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. II. Correlation analysis. Divenyi PL; Haupt KM Ear Hear; 1997 Apr; 18(2):100-13. PubMed ID: 9099559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss. Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory and Cognitive Factors Associated with Speech-in-Noise Complaints following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Hoover EC; Souza PE; Gallun FJ J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Apr; 28(4):325-339. PubMed ID: 28418327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Assessment of Functional Hearing Deficits: Speech-in-Noise Performance. Phatak SA; Brungart DS; Zion DJ; Grant KW Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 30134353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction. Wu YH; Bentler RA Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation. Reinhart PN; Souza PE J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 29309025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relations Between the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise and Psychophysical Measures of Hearing Measured in Four Languages Using the Auditory Profile Test Battery. Van Esch TE; Dreschler WA Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26647417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Combined effects of noise and reverberation on speech recognition performance of normal-hearing children and adults. Neuman AC; Wroblewski M; Hajicek J; Rubinstein A Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):336-44. PubMed ID: 20215967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students. Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech-in-speech listening on the LiSN-S test by older adults with good audiograms depends on cognition and hearing acuity at high frequencies. Besser J; Festen JM; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Pichora-Fuller MK Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):24-41. PubMed ID: 25207850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss. Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities? Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Masking of speech in young and elderly listeners with hearing loss. Souza PE; Turner CW J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 8084195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. Gordon-Salant S; Fitzgibbons PJ J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Dec; 36(6):1276-85. PubMed ID: 8114494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Behavioral and electrophysiologic binaural processing in persons with symmetric hearing loss. Leigh-Paffenroth ED; Roup CM; Noe CM J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):181-93; quiz 194-5. PubMed ID: 21545770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of dichotic/diotic versus monotic presentation on speech understanding in noise in elderly hearing-impaired listeners. Kaplan H; Pickett JM Ear Hear; 1981; 2(5):202-7. PubMed ID: 7297784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Elderly listeners with low intelligibility scores under reverberation show degraded subcortical representation of reverberant speech. Fujihira H; Shiraishi K; Remijn GB Neurosci Lett; 2017 Jan; 637():102-107. PubMed ID: 27884735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]