These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9201454)

  • 21. Hearing loss, aging, and speech perception in reverberation and noise.
    Helfer KS; Wilber LA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):149-55. PubMed ID: 2314073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory rehabilitation after stroke: treatment of auditory processing disorders in stroke patients with personal frequency-modulated (FM) systems.
    Koohi N; Vickers D; Chandrashekar H; Tsang B; Werring D; Bamiou DE
    Disabil Rehabil; 2017 Mar; 39(6):586-593. PubMed ID: 27008578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measuring the effects of reverberation and noise on sentence intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners.
    George EL; Goverts ST; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1429-39. PubMed ID: 20689027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of hearing and age on speech recognition scores in noise in audiological patients and in the general population.
    Barrenäs ML; Wikström I
    Ear Hear; 2000 Dec; 21(6):569-77. PubMed ID: 11132783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Auditory and nonauditory factors affecting speech reception in noise by older listeners.
    George EL; Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Goverts ST; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2362-75. PubMed ID: 17471748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of intensity perturbations on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Schijndel NH; Houtgast T; Festen JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2202-10. PubMed ID: 11386571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The relationship between the intelligibility of time-compressed speech and speech in noise in young and elderly listeners.
    Versfeld NJ; Dreschler WA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):401-8. PubMed ID: 11831813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility.
    Valderrama JT; Beach EF; Yeend I; Sharma M; Van Dun B; Dillon H
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly.
    Divenyi PL; Stark PB; Haupt KM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Aug; 118(2):1089-100. PubMed ID: 16158663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of speech intelligibility index predictions for noise-masked young listeners with normal hearing and for elderly listeners with hearing impairment.
    Hargus SE; Gordon-Salant S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Feb; 38(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 7731214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Auditory Processing Performance of the Middle-Aged and Elderly: Auditory or Cognitive Decline?
    Murphy CFB; Rabelo CM; Silagi ML; Mansur LL; Bamiou DE; Schochat E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 29309019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Brainstem Evoked Potential Indices of Subcortical Auditory Processing After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Vander Werff KR; Rieger B
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):e200-e214. PubMed ID: 28319479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Frequency and temporal resolution in elderly listeners with good and poor word recognition.
    Phillips SL; Gordon-Salant S; Fitzgibbons PJ; Yeni-Komshian G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Feb; 43(1):217-28. PubMed ID: 10668664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Distance and reverberation effects on directional benefit.
    Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2003 Dec; 24(6):472-84. PubMed ID: 14663347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech identification difficulties of hearing-impaired elderly persons: the contributions of auditory processing deficits.
    Humes LE; Christopherson L
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Jun; 34(3):686-93. PubMed ID: 2072694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of age and hearing loss on auditory stream segregation of speech sounds.
    David M; Tausend AN; Strelcyk O; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2018 Jul; 364():118-128. PubMed ID: 29602593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Magnified Neural Envelope Coding Predicts Deficits in Speech Perception in Noise.
    Millman RE; Mattys SL; Gouws AD; Prendergast G
    J Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 37(32):7727-7736. PubMed ID: 28694336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.