These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9201855)
1. Efficacy of five cervical orthoses in restricting cervical motion. A comparison study. Askins V; Eismont FJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jun; 22(11):1193-8. PubMed ID: 9201855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses. Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the Nebraska collar, a new prototype cervical immobilization collar, with three standard models. Alberts LR; Mahoney CR; Neff JR J Orthop Trauma; 1998 Aug; 12(6):425-30. PubMed ID: 9715451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical orthoses effect on cervical spine motion: roentgenographic and goniometric method of study. Fisher SV; Bowar JF; Awad EA; Gullickson G Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1977 Mar; 58(3):109-15. PubMed ID: 843201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effects of Cervical Orthoses on Head and Intervertebral Range of Motion. Oyekan AA; LeVasseur CM; Chen SR; Padmanabhan A; Makowicz N; Donaldson WF; Lee JY; Shaw JD; Anderst WJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2023 Nov; 48(22):1561-1567. PubMed ID: 37339257 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation. Ivancic PC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of various cervical orthoses. An in vivo comparison of the mechanical stability provided by several widely used models. Sandler AJ; Dvorak J; Humke T; Grob D; Daniels W Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jul; 21(14):1624-9. PubMed ID: 8839463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 3D motion analysis study comparing the effectiveness of cervical spine orthoses at restricting spinal motion through physiological ranges. Evans NR; Hooper G; Edwards R; Whatling G; Sparkes V; Holt C; Ahuja S Eur Spine J; 2013 Mar; 22 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S10-5. PubMed ID: 23288458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness of Adjustable Cervical Orthoses and Modular Cervical Thoracic Orthoses in Restricting Neck Motion: A Comparative In vivo Biomechanical Study. Gao F Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(19):E1046-51. PubMed ID: 26076435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical analysis of cervical orthoses in flexion and extension: a comparison of cervical collars and cervical thoracic orthoses. Gavin TM; Carandang G; Havey R; Flanagan P; Ghanayem A; Patwardhan AG J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(6):527-37. PubMed ID: 15077665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of efficacy and 3D kinematic characteristics of cervical orthoses. Zhang S; Wortley M; Clowers K; Krusenklaus JH Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Mar; 20(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 15698698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How effective is the Newport/Aspen collar? A prospective radiographic evaluation in healthy adult volunteers. Hughes SJ J Trauma; 1998 Aug; 45(2):374-8. PubMed ID: 9715199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Soft and rigid collars provide similar restriction in cervical range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living. Miller CP; Bible JE; Jegede KA; Whang PG; Grauer JN Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):1271-8. PubMed ID: 20512025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The yale cervical orthosis: an evaluation of its effectiveness in restricting cervical motion in normal subjects and a comparison with other cervical orthoses. Johnson RM; Hart DL; Owen JR; Lerner E; Chapin W; Zeleznik R Phys Ther; 1978 Jul; 58(7):865-71. PubMed ID: 662928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the effectiveness of the Minerva cervicothoracic orthosis. Sharpe KP; Rao S; Ziogas A Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jul; 20(13):1475-9. PubMed ID: 8623066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study. Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Schnake K; Lucke M; Schröder R; Mittlmeier T Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 May; 26(9):1028-37. PubMed ID: 11337621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of 2 different thoracolumbar orthoses on the stability of the spine during various body movements. Kienle A; Saidi S; Oberst M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):E1082-9. PubMed ID: 23644685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]