These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9201855)

  • 21. Comparison of Cervical Range-of-Motion Restriction and Craniofacial Tissue-Interface Pressure With 2 Adjustable and 2 Standard Cervical Collars.
    Tescher AN; Rindflesch AB; Youdas JW; Terman RW; Jacobson TM; Douglas LL; Miers AG; Austin CM; Delgado AM; Zins SM; Lahr BD; Pichelmann MA; Heller SF; Huddleston PM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Mar; 41(6):E304-12. PubMed ID: 26536441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of three lumbar orthoses using motion assessment during task performance.
    Krag MH; Fox MS J; Haugh LD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2359-67. PubMed ID: 14560084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effectiveness of extrication collars tested during the execution of spine-board transfer techniques.
    Del Rossi G; Heffernan TP; Horodyski M; Rechtine GR
    Spine J; 2004; 4(6):619-23. PubMed ID: 15541692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cineradiography of the braced normal cervical spine. A comparative study of five commonly used cervical orthoses.
    Hartman JT; Palumbo F; Hill BJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1975; (109):97-102. PubMed ID: 1132211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of current extrication orthoses in immobilization of the unstable cervical spine.
    McGuire RA; Degnan G; Amundson GM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1990 Oct; 15(10):1064-7. PubMed ID: 2263973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cervical sagittal range-of-motion analysis using three methods. Cervical range-of-motion device, 3space, and radiography.
    Ordway NR; Seymour R; Donelson RG; Hojnowski L; Lee E; Edwards WT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Mar; 22(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 9076881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cervical orthoses.
    Beavis A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1989 Apr; 13(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 2717386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reduction in head and intervertebral motion provided by 7 contemporary cervical orthoses in 45 individuals.
    Schneider AM; Hipp JA; Nguyen L; Reitman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):E1-6. PubMed ID: 17202874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of two new immobilization collars.
    Rosen PB; McSwain NE; Arata M; Stahl S; Mercer D
    Ann Emerg Med; 1992 Oct; 21(10):1189-95. PubMed ID: 1416295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cervical orthoses. A study comparing their effectiveness in restricting cervical motion in normal subjects.
    Johnson RM; Hart DL; Simmons EF; Ramsby GR; Southwick WO
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1977 Apr; 59(3):332-9. PubMed ID: 849944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intervertebral kinematics of the cervical spine before, during, and after high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation.
    Anderst WJ; Gale T; LeVasseur C; Raj S; Gongaware K; Schneider M
    Spine J; 2018 Dec; 18(12):2333-2342. PubMed ID: 30142458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of a SAM splint-molded cervical collar with a Philadelphia cervical collar.
    McGrath T; Murphy C
    Wilderness Environ Med; 2009; 20(2):166-8. PubMed ID: 19594206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sagittal plane segmental motion of the cervical spine. A new precision measurement protocol and normal motion data of healthy adults.
    Frobin W; Leivseth G; Biggemann M; Brinckmann P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2002 Jan; 17(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 11779643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Restriction of Cervical Intervertebral Movement With Different Types of External Immobilizers: A Cadaveric 3D Analysis Study.
    Holla M; Hannink G; Eggen TGE; Daanen RA; Hosman AJF; Verdonschot N
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Oct; 42(20):E1182-E1189. PubMed ID: 28230622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical and radiological evaluation of Vertebrace extrication collars.
    Solot JA; Winzelberg GG
    J Emerg Med; 1990; 8(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 2351802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. In vivo analysis of atlantoaxial motion in individuals immobilized with the halo thoracic vest or Philadelphia collar.
    Koller H; Zenner J; Hitzl W; Ferraris L; Resch H; Tauber M; Auffarth A; Lederer S; Mayer M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(7):670-9. PubMed ID: 19333098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vivo 3D kinematic changes in the cervical spine after laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Nagamoto Y; Iwasaki M; Sugiura T; Fujimori T; Matsuo Y; Kashii M; Sakaura H; Ishii T; Murase T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Sep; 21(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 24926932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficacy of five cervical orthoses in restricting cervical motion: a comparison study.
    Hughes S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Mar; 23(6):744. PubMed ID: 9549799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cervical flexion, extension, protrusion, and retraction. A radiographic segmental analysis.
    Ordway NR; Seymour RJ; Donelson RG; Hojnowski LS; Edwards WT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(3):240-7. PubMed ID: 10025018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.