454 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9202354)
1. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems.
Munsif AN; Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Matthew P; Giorgberidze I; Kaushik RR; Mehra R
Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using an axillary or a pectoral thoracic electrode location.
Saksena S; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Raju R; Mathew P; Mehra R
Circulation; 1993 Dec; 88(6):2655-60. PubMed ID: 8252676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transvenous biventricular defibrillation.
Meisel E; Butter C; Philippon F; Higgins S; Strickberger SA; Smith J; Hahn S; Michel U; Schubert B; Pfeiffer D
Am J Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 86(9A):76K-85K. PubMed ID: 11084104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations.
Fotuhi PC; Ideker RE; Idriss SF; Callihan RL; Walker RG; Alt EU
Circulation; 1995 Nov; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of electrode configuration and capacitor size on internal atrial defibrillation threshold using leads currently used for ventricular defibrillation.
Neri R; Palermo P; Cesario AS; Baragli D; Amici E; Laudadio MT; De Rosa A; DeSeta F; Mongeon L; Gambelli G
J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Jul; 3(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 10387142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Initial clinical experience with endocardial defibrillation using an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator with a triple-electrode system.
Saksena S; Tullo NG; Krol RB; Mauro AM
Arch Intern Med; 1989 Oct; 149(10):2333-9. PubMed ID: 2802898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combination biphasic waveform plus sequential pulse defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of a nonthoracotomy lead system.
Exner D; Yee R; Jones DL; Klein GJ; Mehra R
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Feb; 23(2):317-22. PubMed ID: 8294680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective, randomized, comparison in patients between a pectoral unipolar defibrillation system and that using an additional inferior vena cava electrode.
Favale S; Dicandia CD; Tunzi P; Rizzon P
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Aug; 22(8):1140-5. PubMed ID: 10461288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical efficacy and safety of atrial defibrillation using biphasic shocks and current nonthoracotomy endocardial lead configurations.
Saksena S; Prakash A; Mangeon L; Varanasi S; Kolettis T; Mathew P; De Groot P; Mehra R; Krol RB
Am J Cardiol; 1995 Nov; 76(12):913-21. PubMed ID: 7484831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimal electrode position for transvenous defibrillation: a prospective randomized study.
Stajduhar KC; Ott GY; Kron J; McAnulty JH; Oliver RP; Reynolds BT; Adler SW; Halperin BD
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1996 Jan; 27(1):90-4. PubMed ID: 8522716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using endocardial leads.
Saksena S; An H; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Burkhardt E; Mehta D; John T
Am J Cardiol; 1992 Aug; 70(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 1632393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal electrode configuration for pectoral transvenous implantable defibrillator without an active can.
Swerdlow CD; Davie S; Kass RM; Chen PS; Hwang C; Mandel WJ; Gang ES; Raissi S; Peter CT
Am J Cardiol; 1995 Aug; 76(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 7639162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Successful implantation of cardioverter-defibrillator systems in patients with elevated defibrillation thresholds.
Brooks R; Torchiana D; Vlahakes GJ; Ruskin JN; McGovern BA; Garan H
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Aug; 22(2):569-74. PubMed ID: 8335831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimal method to achieve consistently low defibrillation energy requirements.
Winter J; Zimmermann N; Lidolt H; Dees H; Perings C; Vester EG; Poll L; Schipke JD; Contzen K; Gams E
Am J Cardiol; 2000 Nov; 86(9A):71K-75K. PubMed ID: 11084103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of an active abdominal pulse generator on defibrillation thresholds with a dual-coil, transvenous ICD lead system.
Rashba EJ; Farasat M; Kirk MM; Shorofsky SR; Peters RW; Gold MR
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 17(6):617-20. PubMed ID: 16836709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of polarity for monophasic and biphasic shocks on defibrillation efficacy with an endocardial system.
Usui M; Walcott GP; Strickberger SA; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Jan; 19(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 8848379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endocardial pacing, cardioversion and defibrillation using a braided endocardial lead system.
Saksena S; Luceri R; Krol RB; Brownstein S; Burkhardt E; Accorti P; Brewer G; Scott S; Callaghan F; Livingston A
Am J Cardiol; 1993 Apr; 71(10):834-41. PubMed ID: 8456763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Atrial defibrillation thresholds of electrode configurations available to an atrioventricular defibrillator.
Benser ME; Walcott GP; Killingsworth CR; Girouard SD; Morris MM; Ideker RE
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 12(8):957-64. PubMed ID: 11513449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lack of benefit of an active pectoral pulse generator on atrial defibrillation thresholds.
Gold MR; Shorofsky SR; Bouhouch R; Joy RA; Kirby DS; Osman AF; Rashba EJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Apr; 13(4):332-5. PubMed ID: 12033348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electrode polarity is an important determinant of defibrillation efficacy using a nonthoracotomy system.
Thakur RK; Souza JJ; Chapman PD; Troup PJ; Wetherbee JN
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 May; 17(5 Pt 1):919-23. PubMed ID: 8022704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
