179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9202894)
1. The effects of different sampling techniques on smear quality and the diagnosis of cytological abnormalities in cervical screening.
Williamson SL; Hair T; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 9202894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.
Mango LJ; Valente PT
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ
Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cervix cytology: Cervex Brush versus conventional cotton swab].
Altermatt HJ; Wyler K; Fravi R; Liu X; Kraft R; Dreher E
Praxis (Bern 1994); 1997 Jun; 86(24):1029-33. PubMed ID: 9312820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervex brush versus vaginal-cervical-endocervical (VCE) triple smear techniques in cervical sampling.
Järvi K
Cytopathology; 1997 Aug; 8(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 9252746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of their ability to sample abnormal cells for cervical smears.
Hutchinson M; Fertitta L; Goldbaum B; Hamza M; Vanerian S; Isenstein L
J Reprod Med; 1991 Aug; 36(8):581-6. PubMed ID: 1941800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of cytobrush with Cervex-Brush for endocervical cytologic sampling.
Neinstein LS; Church J; Akiyoshi T
J Adolesc Health; 1992 Sep; 13(6):520-3. PubMed ID: 1390820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cell surplus on sampling devices after routine cervical cytologic smears. A study of residual cell populations.
Goodman A; Hutchinson ML
J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):239-41. PubMed ID: 8728075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation.
Risberg B; Andersson A; Zetterberg C; Nordin B
J Reprod Med; 1997 Jul; 42(7):405-8. PubMed ID: 9252930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adequacy of cervical cytology sampling with the Cervex brush and the Aylesbury spatula: a population based randomised controlled trial.
Dey P; Collins S; Desai M; Woodman C
BMJ; 1996 Sep; 313(7059):721-3. PubMed ID: 8819441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data.
Austin RM; Ramzy I
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 9479337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CytoRich liquid-based cervical cytologic test. Screening results in a routine cytopathology service.
Vassilakos P; Griffin S; Megevand E; Campana A
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):198-202. PubMed ID: 9479340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The quality of the Pap smear.
Fokke HE; Salvatore CM; Schipper ME; Bleker OP
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 1992; 13(5):445-8. PubMed ID: 1486925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
Lee JS; Kuan L; Oh S; Patten FW; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A trial of two methods of taking cervical smears: the Aylesbury spatula plus cytology brush compared to the Cervex broom.
Sparrow MJ; Fauck R; Gupta RK
N Z Med J; 1997 Sep; 110(1052):356-8. PubMed ID: 9364178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods.
McCord ML; Stovall TG; Meric JL; Summitt RL; Coleman SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 166(6 Pt 1):1772-7; discussion 1777-9. PubMed ID: 1615986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
