143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9202897)
1. Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology.
Dalla Palma P
Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8(3):210. PubMed ID: 9202897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology.
Herbert A; Johnson J; Patnick J
Cytopathology; 1995 Oct; 6(5):301-3. PubMed ID: 8785367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [An operative model: verification of the quality of the screening Pap test ].
Montanari GR; Arnaud S; Berardengo E; Campione D; Cozzani C; Parisio F; Viberti L; Ghiringhello B
Pathologica; 2001 Oct; 93(5):609-10. PubMed ID: 11725370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality control in cytopathology applied to screening for cervical carcinoma.
Marsan C
Pol J Pathol; 1995; 46(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 8713292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changing terminology and screening recommendations in cervical cytology screening programs.
Robertson DI; Srivannaboon S; Pairwuti S
J Med Assoc Thai; 1992 Jan; 75 Suppl 1():90-3. PubMed ID: 1402489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity of primary screening by rapid review: 'to act or not to act on the results, that is the question'.
Slater DN
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 9577733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cervical Cytology Practice Guidelines. American Society of Cytopathology.
Cortese C;
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(2):201-26. PubMed ID: 11284307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Recommended code of practice for laboratories providing a cytopathology service 1997. British Society for Clinical Cytology.
Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8 Suppl 1():1-25. PubMed ID: 9202905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Internal quality control for cervical cytopathology laboratories.
Coleman DV
Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 8833867
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines for educational notes, disclaimers, and similar comments on reports of cervical cytology specimens.
Papanicolau Society of Cytopathology Practice Guidelines Task Force
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 May; 28(5):282-5. PubMed ID: 12722126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rapid review.
Faraker CA
Cytopathology; 1998 Apr; 9(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 9660635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting, and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology. Second edition including revised performance indicators.
Johnson EJ; Patnick J;
Cytopathology; 2000 Aug; 11(4):212-41. PubMed ID: 10983723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A pilot study of cervical screening in an inner city area--lessons for a national programme.
Herity B; McDonald P; Johnson Z; Carroll B; Cody M; Duignan N; McGee D; O'Kelly F; Hurley M
Cytopathology; 1997 Jun; 8(3):161-70. PubMed ID: 9202891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. European guidelines on cervical screening.
Smith JH; Desai MS
Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):211-2. PubMed ID: 17635160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Cervical Cancer Screening. Europe against cancer programme.
Coleman D; Day N; Douglas G; Farmery E; Lynge E; Philip J; Segnan N
Eur J Cancer; 1993; 29A Suppl 4():S1-38. PubMed ID: 8274301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. High prevalence of human papillomavirus and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a young Australian STD population.
McKinnon KJ; Ford RM; Hunter JC
Int J STD AIDS; 1991; 2(4):276-9. PubMed ID: 1655057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Partial rescreening of all negative smears: an improved method of quality assurance in laboratories undertaking cervical screening.
Faraker CA
Cytopathology; 1993; 4(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 8453016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Report of working party on internal quality control for cervical cytopathology laboratories summary and recommendations.
Cytopathology; 1996 Feb; 7(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 8833868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [The European aptitude test for cervical cytopathology].
Branca M
Pathologica; 2001 Feb; 93(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 11294016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Significance of physical findings in diagnosis of cervical carcinoma.
Moller KA; Fogh H; Moller PE; Strandbygard K
Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):122-7. PubMed ID: 5041568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
