BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9203775)

  • 1. Clinical guidelines for indirect resin restorations.
    Shannon A
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1997 Jun; 63(6):432-7. PubMed ID: 9203775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Indirect posterior restorations: steps to clinical success.
    Shannon A
    Curr Opin Cosmet Dent; 1997; 4():40-4. PubMed ID: 9663049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Considerations for the successful placement of laboratory-processed, indirect composite restorations.
    Alex G
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2003 Aug; 24(8 Suppl):43-7; quiz 62. PubMed ID: 14692220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Esthetic inlays and onlays.
    Jackson RD
    Curr Opin Cosmet Dent; 1994; ():30-9. PubMed ID: 8032438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC; Staninec M; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Conservative indirect restorations for posterior teeth. Cast versus bonded ceramic.
    Donovan TE; Chee WW
    Dent Clin North Am; 1993 Jul; 37(3):433-43. PubMed ID: 8348996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal adaptation and microtensile bond strength of composite indirect restorations bonded to dentin treated with adhesive and low-viscosity composite.
    de Andrade OS; de Goes MF; Montes MA
    Dent Mater; 2007 Mar; 23(3):279-87. PubMed ID: 16546249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N; Aykent F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictable cementation of esthetic restorations: part II--selection criteria and guidelines for implementation.
    Quintas AF
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 19(9):7-9. PubMed ID: 18038716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Combining bonded and cemented restorations: a multitechnique case study.
    Shannon A
    Dent Today; 2000 Apr; 19(4):54, 56, 58-61; quiz 61, 151. PubMed ID: 19750729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adhesive cementation of etchable ceramic esthetic restorations.
    Santos GC; Santos MJ; Rizkalla AS
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2009 Jun; 75(5):379-84. PubMed ID: 19531335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Copy-milled all-ceramic restorations: case reports.
    Sevük C; Gür H; Akkayan B
    Quintessence Int; 2002 May; 33(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 12014164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical considerations for aesthetic laboratory-fabricated inlay/onlay restorations: a review.
    Terry DA; Touati B
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001; 13(1):51-8; quiz 60. PubMed ID: 11301531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aesthetic and adhesive cementation for contemporary porcelain crowns.
    Touati B; Quintas AF
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2001 Oct; 13(8):611-20; quiz 622. PubMed ID: 11799792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Ceramic inlays and onlays].
    van Pelt AW; de Kloet HJ; van der Kuy P
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):472-6. PubMed ID: 11921995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Esthetic posterior restorations utilizing the double-inlay technique: a novel approach in esthetic dentistry.
    Hannig M; Schmeiser R
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Feb; 28(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 10332359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite.
    Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P
    Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.