These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

393 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9203777)

  • 61. Effect of two etching times on the sealing ability of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 in Class V restorations.
    Ferrari M; Mannocci F; Vichi A; Davidson CL
    Am J Dent; 1997 Apr; 10(2):66-70. PubMed ID: 9545892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage.
    Opdam NJ; Feilzer AJ; Roeters JJ; Smale I
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 10388382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Influence of restorative techniques on marginal adaptation and dye penetration around Class V restorations.
    Pereira Ade F; Poiate IA; Poiate E; Rodrigues FP; Turbino ML; Miranda WG
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):e17-21. PubMed ID: 22313988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Microleakage evaluation of four self-etching adhesive systems.
    Kirk PC; Fitchie JG; Phillips SM; Puckett AD
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(3):e104-9. PubMed ID: 20478786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. In vitro analysis of the effects of acid or laser etching on microleakage around composite resin restorations.
    Yazici AR; Frentzen M; Dayangac B
    J Dent; 2001 Jul; 29(5):355-61. PubMed ID: 11472808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Microleakage in facial and lingual Class 5 composite restorations: a comparison.
    Barnes DM; McDonald NJ; Thompson VP; Blank LW; Shires PJ
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):133-7. PubMed ID: 9028232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The effects on pulp tissue of microleakage in resin composite restorations.
    Sasafuchi Y; Otsuki M; Inokoshi S; Tagami J
    J Med Dent Sci; 1999 Dec; 46(4):155-64. PubMed ID: 12160253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Cervical microleakage in Class II open-sandwich restorations: an in vitro study.
    Fourie J; Smit CF
    SADJ; 2011 Aug; 66(7):320-4. PubMed ID: 23198465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Microleakage in class II restorations: open vs closed centripetal build-up technique.
    Fabianelli A; Sgarra A; Goracci C; Cantoro A; Pollington S; Ferrari M
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20533631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. One-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without additional enamel etching technique in cervical lesions.
    Ozel E; Say EC; Yurdaguven H; Soyman M
    Aust Dent J; 2010 Jun; 55(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 20604757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The effect of current-generation bonding systems on microleakage of resin composite restorations.
    Yazici AR; Başeren M; Dayangaç B
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(10):763-9. PubMed ID: 12553620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. The effects of surface pretreatment on the microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement restorations.
    Bayrak S; Sen TE; Tuloglu N
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2012; 36(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 22838231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Effect of different application and polymerization techniques on the microleakage of proximal resin composite restorations in vitro.
    Brunton PA; Kassir A; Dashti M; Setcos JC
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 14753333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Microleakage of etched-dentin composite resin restorations.
    Swift EJ; LeValley BD
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jul; 23(7):505-8. PubMed ID: 1410253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Dentin adhesives and microleakage in cervical resin composites.
    Sidhu SK; Henderson LJ
    Am J Dent; 1992 Oct; 5(5):240-4. PubMed ID: 1299247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations.
    Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Wernecke KD; Roulet JF
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):401-10. PubMed ID: 11203848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Gingival seal of deep Class II direct and indirect composite restorations.
    Kenyon BJ; Frederickson D; Hagge MS
    Am J Dent; 2007 Feb; 20(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 17380801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Occlusal loading evaluation in the cervical integrity of Class II cavities filled with composite.
    Campos PE; Sampaio Filho HR; Barceleiro Mde O
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(6):727-32. PubMed ID: 16382595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Sealing capacity of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and resin composite placed in vivo in Class 5 restorations.
    Ferrari M; Davidson CL
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(2):69-72. PubMed ID: 8957921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. In vitro microleakage associated with posterior composite restorations used with different base/bonding system combinations.
    Youngson CC; Grey NJ; Jones JG; Redfern E
    Dent Mater; 1991 Oct; 7(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 1814770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.