These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9204636)

  • 1. Have the hypnotic susceptibility scales outlived their usefulness?
    Woody EZ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):226-38. PubMed ID: 9204636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Suggestibility or hypnosis: what do our scales really measure?
    Kirsch I
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 9204635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hypnotic susceptibility: a personal and historical note regarding the development and naming of the Stanford Scales.
    Weitzenhoffer AM
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Apr; 45(2):126-43. PubMed ID: 9077050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hypnotic susceptibility scales: are the mean scores increasing?
    Benham G; Smith N; Nash MR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2002 Jan; 50(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 11778707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hypnotic responsivity of the deaf: the development of the University of Tennessee Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale for the Deaf.
    Repka RJ; Nash MR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Jul; 43(3):316-31. PubMed ID: 7635582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multivariate approach to the prediction of hypnotic susceptibility.
    Dixon M; Labelle L; Laurence JR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1996 Jul; 44(3):250-64. PubMed ID: 8690536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Portuguese norms for the Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility.
    Carvalho C; Kirsch I; Mazzoni G; Leal I
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2008 Jul; 56(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 18569140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hypnotic suggestibility, cognitive inhibition, and dissociation.
    Dienes Z; Brown E; Hutton S; Kirsch I; Mazzoni G; Wright DB
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Dec; 18(4):837-47. PubMed ID: 19709904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological and interpretative issues regarding the Phenomenology of consciousness inventory--hypnotic assessment procedure: a comment on pekala et al. (2010a, 2010b).
    Terhune DB; Cardeña E
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2010 Oct; 53(2):109-17; discussion 119-32. PubMed ID: 21049744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential patterns of spontaneous experiential response to a hypnotic induction: a latent profile analysis.
    Terhune DB; Cardeña E
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Dec; 19(4):1140-50. PubMed ID: 20395157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct and indirect scales of hypnotic susceptibility: resistance to therapy and psychometric comparability.
    Robin BR; Kumar VK; Pekala RJ
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2005 Apr; 53(2):135-47. PubMed ID: 16025732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The hypnosis scales at their centenary: some fundamental issues still unresolved.
    Balthazard CG
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jan; 41(1):47-73. PubMed ID: 8425775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioral and subjective scoring of the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: further data and an extension.
    Kumar VK; Marcano G; Pekala RJ
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1996 Jan; 38(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 8712162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A spanish version of the barber suggestibility scale for the puerto rican population.
    Guzmán-Hosta L; Martínez-Taboas A; Rodríguez-Gómez J
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2007 Jan; 55(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 17135063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is hypnotic suggestibility a stable trait?
    Fassler O; Lynn SJ; Knox J
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Mar; 17(1):240-53. PubMed ID: 17576075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Responsiveness to direct versus indirect hypnotic procedures: the role of resistance as a predictor variable.
    Groth-Marnat G; Mitchell K
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Oct; 46(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9780524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Italian norms for the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C.
    De Pascalis V; Bellusci A; Russo PM
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2000 Jul; 48(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 10902296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suggestibility, expectancy, trance state effects, and hypnotic depth: II. Assessment via the PCI-HAP.
    Pekala RJ; Kumar VK; Maurer R; Elliott-Carter N; Moon E; Mullen K
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2010 Apr; 52(4):291-318. PubMed ID: 20499543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The "big five" and hypnotic suggestibility.
    Nordenstrom BK; Council JR; Meier BP
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2002 Jul; 50(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 12088333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Not all group hypnotic suggestibility scales are created equal: individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses.
    Barnes SM; Lynn SJ; Pekala RJ
    Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 18778955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.