331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9206079)
1. Exercise hemodynamic benefits of rate adaptive ventricular pacing.
Ma J; Wang F; Zhang K; Yu P; Wang J; Chen X
Chin Med J (Engl); 1996 Jun; 109(6):459-62. PubMed ID: 9206079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Use of a rate responsive pacemaker in sick sinus syndrome].
Ito T; Nishino M; Nakagawa T; Okada T; Hasegawa S; Kuryu T; Ebisuno S; Ohnishi S; Tanahashi H; Yasuno M
Kokyu To Junkan; 1993 Jan; 41(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8434162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [DDD versus DDDR pacemaker stimulation: comparison of cardiopulmonary performance, incidence of atrial arrhythmias and quality of life].
Epperlein S; Kreft A; Siegert V; Liebrich A; Himmrich E; Treese N
Z Kardiol; 1996 Apr; 85(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 8693765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Haemodynamic advantage with single chamber rate responsive pacemakers over dual chamber pacemakers during exercise in chronotropic incompetence.
Maity AK; Ghosh SP; Dasbiswas A; Chatterjee SS; Chaudhury D; Das MK
Indian Heart J; 1992; 44(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 1289220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [30 years cardiac pacemaker therapy: a status evaluation].
Stangl K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H
Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):383-95. PubMed ID: 2198730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experience with activity sensing rate responsive ventricular pacing. A study based upon assessment of exercise tolerance.
Kaul U; Sundar AS; Bhatia ML
J Assoc Physicians India; 1989 May; 37(5):318-22. PubMed ID: 2613638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Chronic frequency-adaptive pacemaker therapy in patients with heart failure].
Haltern G; Kempa L; Ochs JG; Hanrath P; Sigmund M
Z Kardiol; 1995 Oct; 84(10):834-43. PubMed ID: 7502571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Cardiopulmonary stress: control of the function of frequency variable pacemaker systems].
Treese N; Coutinho M; Ophoff N; Rhein S; Pop T; Meyer J
Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):396-402. PubMed ID: 2378157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of heart rate on the working capacity of patients with complete heart block and physiological pacemaker.
Lukl J; Heinc P
Cor Vasa; 1991; 33(6):506-13. PubMed ID: 1842943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical experience with a new rate-responsive TX pacemaker.
Yasuno M; Nishino Y; Nishino M; Akashi T; Tanahashi H; Kobayashi K; Yamada Y; Inoue M
Angiology; 1986 Dec; 37(12 Pt 1):888-95. PubMed ID: 3813117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of VVI and DDD cardiac stimulation during exercise test evaluated by respiratory gas exchange measurement. Study of patients with normal systolic function and complete atrioventricular block unchanged during exercise test].
Chabernaud JM; Guéret P; Blanc P; Bavoux O; Bensaid J
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1993 Jan; 86(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 8338403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Activitrax--a pacemaker with a regulated rhythm rate].
Sadowski Z; Zalas K; Srzednicki M; Heybowicz J; Kośmicki M; Pałko T
Kardiol Pol; 1989; 32(10-12):434-9. PubMed ID: 2638421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effects of chronotropic responsive cardiac pacing on ventilatory response to exercise in patients with bradycardia].
Tani M; Fujiki A; Asanoi H; Mizumaki K; Yoshida S; Tsuji H; Sasayama S
J Cardiol; 1992; 22(2-3):503-12. PubMed ID: 1339809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits of rate-responsive pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome.
Nishino M; Ito T; Miyawaki M; Nakagawa T; Kuryu T; Tanahashi H; Yamada Y; Abe H
Angiology; 1994 May; 45(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 8172382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Adequacy of of pacemakers responsive to the volume-minute ventilation rate in heart transplantation patients].
Sant'Anna JR; Castro I; Lima LL; Reis A; Kalil RA; Prates PR; Lucchese FA; Halperin C; Pereira E; Rodrigues R
Arq Bras Cardiol; 1995 Jun; 64(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 8561675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemodynamic advantages of temperature sensing rate adaptive pacemaker.
Rao G
Int Surg; 1993; 78(3):262-5. PubMed ID: 8276555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of dual chamber and ventricular rate responsive pacing in patients over 75 with complete heart block.
Hargreaves MR; Channon KM; Cripps TR; Gardner M; Ormerod OJ
Br Heart J; 1995 Oct; 74(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 7488454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cardiopulmonary responses to exercise in children with activity sensing rate responsive ventricular pacemakers.
Cabrera ME; Hanisch DG; Cohen MH; Murtaugh R; Spector ML; Liebman J
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1993 Jul; 16(7 Pt 1):1386-93. PubMed ID: 7689204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Relative contribution of standard and physiologic stimulation for maximal work capacity in patients with complete atrioventricular block].
Lukl J; Heinc P
Vnitr Lek; 1992 Feb; 38(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 1595197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Respiration-dependent ventricular pacing compared with fixed ventricular and atrial-ventricular synchronous pacing: aerobic and hemodynamic variables.
Rossi P; Rognoni G; Occhetta E; Aina F; Prando MD; Plicchi G; Minella M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Sep; 6(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 4031276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
