These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9206311)

  • 41. Statistical interpretation of DNA evidence.
    Gettinby G; Peterson M; Watson N
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1993; 33(4):212-7. PubMed ID: 8151283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Use of bayes probability method for studying the complex influence of social hygienic living conditions on population morbidity].
    Romenskiĭ AA; Zhukovskiĭ GS; Leonov SA; Murakhoskaia LI
    Sov Zdravookhr; 1974; (12):16-20. PubMed ID: 4453878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Forensic medicine, PCR, and Bayesian approach.
    Taroni F; Champod C
    J Med Genet; 1994 Nov; 31(11):896. PubMed ID: 7853379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Probability and medical diagnosis.
    Lindley DV
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1975 Apr; 9(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 1095732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Projection from previous studies. A caution.
    Korn EL
    Control Clin Trials; 1990 Feb; 11(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 2157583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Commentary on "Dennis McNevin, Bayesian interpretation of discrete class characteristics, Forensic Sci. Int. 292 (2018) 125-130".
    Biedermann A; Hicks T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():e20-e21. PubMed ID: 30745179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of DNA profiles: sense and nonsense.
    Evett IW
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1991; 31(2):205-7. PubMed ID: 1940834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. DNA-fingerprinting: a short note on mutation rates.
    Krawczak M; Bockel B
    Hum Genet; 1991 Sep; 87(5):632-3. PubMed ID: 1916768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The role of prior probability in forensic assessments.
    Thompson WC; Vuille J; Biedermann A; Taroni F
    Front Genet; 2013; 4():220. PubMed ID: 24194748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. What made us ever think we could individualize using statistics?
    Stoney DA
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1991; 31(2):197-9. PubMed ID: 1940832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The likelihood approach to compare populations: a study on DNA evidence and pitfalls of intuitions.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Sci Justice; 1999; 39(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 10795411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The prosecutor's and defendant's Bayesian nomograms.
    Riancho JA; Zarrabeitia MT
    Int J Legal Med; 2002 Oct; 116(5):312-3. PubMed ID: 12376846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Legal standards and the significance of DNA evidence.
    Gomulkiewicz R; Slade NA
    Hum Biol; 1997 Oct; 69(5):675-88. PubMed ID: 9299887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Application of DNA fingerprinting in medicolegal practice.
    Raina A; Dogra TD
    J Indian Med Assoc; 2002 Dec; 100(12):688-94. PubMed ID: 12793630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Does justice require less precision than chemistry?
    Brownlie AR
    Sci Justice; 1997; 37(2):73-4. PubMed ID: 9206311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]     [New Search]
    of 3.