306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9206402)
1. Comparison of screw retention of nine abutment systems: a pilot study.
Schulte JK; Coffey J
Implant Dent; 1997; 6(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 9206402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses.
Siamos G; Winkler S; Boberick KG
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 12498448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preloads generated with repeated tightening in three types of screws used in dental implant assemblies.
Byrne D; Jacobs S; O'Connell B; Houston F; Claffey N
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 16681498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of torque maintenance of abutment and cylinder screws with Morse taper implants.
Ferreira MB; Delben JA; Barão VA; Faverani LP; Dos Santos PH; Assunção WG
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 23(6):e631-4. PubMed ID: 23172504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws.
Haack JE; Sakaguchi RL; Sun T; Coffey JP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(5):529-36. PubMed ID: 7590997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.
Lee J; Kim YS; Kim CW; Han JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 12447217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the effect of retightening and mechanical cycling on preload maintenance of retention screws.
Delben JA; Gomes EA; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 21483877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of eliminating implant/abutment rotational misfit on screw joint stability.
Binon PP; McHugh MJ
Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 9171488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Torque removal evaluation of prosthetic screws after tightening and loosening cycles: an in vitro study.
Cardoso M; Torres MF; Lourenço EJ; de Moraes Telles D; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 21457352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screw loosening with interchangeable abutments in internally connected implants after cyclic loading.
Kim SK; Koak JY; Heo SJ; Taylor TD; Ryoo S; Lee SY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 22299077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: effect of torque level and implant system.
Quek HC; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 18548921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant abutment screw rotations and preloads for four different screw materials and surfaces.
Martin WC; Woody RD; Miller BH; Miller AW
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 11458261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Micromotion and dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface.
Gratton DG; Aquilino SA; Stanford CM
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11174678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of superstructure fit and loading on individual implant units: Part I. The effects of tightening the gold screws and placement of a superstructure with varying degrees of fit.
Isa ZM; Hobkirk JA
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1995 Dec; 3(6):247-53. PubMed ID: 8603168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Practical clinical guidelines to prevent screw loosening.
Hurson S
Int J Dent Symp; 1995; 3(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 9117862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
Cibirka RM; Nelson SK; Lang BR; Rueggeberg FA
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection.
Kim KS; Lim YJ; Kim MJ; Kwon HB; Yang JH; Lee JB; Yim SH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21198900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Load fatigue performance of two implant-abutment combinations.
Basten CH; Nicholls JI; Daly CH; Taggart R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):522-8. PubMed ID: 8803348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
