These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9206423)

  • 1. Factors affecting the cutting ability of sonic files.
    Lumley PJ; Harrington E; Aspinwall E; Blunt L; Walmsley AD; Marquis PM
    Int Endod J; 1996 May; 29(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 9206423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cutting ability of Heliosonic, Rispisonic, and Shaper files.
    Lumley PJ
    J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):221-4. PubMed ID: 9594769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors affecting the wear of sonic files.
    Lumley PJ
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1996 Aug; 12(4):197-201. PubMed ID: 9028184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intra-canal cutting ability of MM1500 files.
    Lumley PJ; Harrington E; Marquis PM; Walmsley AD
    Int Endod J; 1996 Sep; 29(5):309-14. PubMed ID: 9206413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Taper and stiffness of sonic endodontic files.
    Lumley PJ; Harrington E; Walmsley AD; Marquis PM
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1996 Apr; 12(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 9028201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cutting characteristics of a sonic root-end preparation instrument.
    Devall R; Lumley PJ; Waplington M; Blunt L
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1996 Apr; 12(2):96-9. PubMed ID: 9028204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of the surface cut by sonic files.
    Lumley PJ; Blunt L; Walmsley AD; Marquis PM
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1996 Oct; 12(5):240-5. PubMed ID: 9206370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of two endodontic handpieces during the preparation of root canals in extracted human teeth.
    Smith RB; Edmunds DH
    Int Endod J; 1998 Jan; 31(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 9823125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shaping of simulated root canals in resin blocks using files activated by a sonic handpiece.
    Dummer PM; Alodeh MH; Doller R
    Int Endod J; 1989 Sep; 22(5):211-5. PubMed ID: 2637228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of cutting ability and plastic deformation of reciprocating files.
    Kowalczuck A; Sydney GB; Martinez EF; Cardoso RJ
    Braz Oral Res; 2016; 30():. PubMed ID: 26676196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shaping ability of two rotary instruments in simulated canals: stainless steel ENDOflash and nickel-titanium HERO Shaper.
    Perez F; Schoumacher M; Peli JF
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 16104977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vivo evaluation of two types of files used to accurately determine the diameter of the apical constriction of a root canal: an in vivo study.
    Darda S; Manwar N; Chandak M; Shori DD
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jul; 10(4):43-50. PubMed ID: 19575053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.
    Blum JY; Machtou P; Ruddle C; Micallef JP
    J Endod; 2003 Sep; 29(9):567-75. PubMed ID: 14503829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of using files with altered tips in a sonic handpiece: an in vitro study.
    Dummer PM; Hutchings R; Hartles FR
    Int Endod J; 1993 Jul; 26(4):209-17. PubMed ID: 8225639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Mechanical characteristics of ultrasonic device for root canal treatment].
    Hata H
    Kanagawa Shigaku; 1989 Mar; 23(4):587-97. PubMed ID: 2637372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of cleaning, disinfection, and sterilization procedures on the cutting efficiency of endodontic files.
    Haïkel Y; Serfaty R; Bleicher P; Lwin TT; Allemann C
    J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):657-61. PubMed ID: 9220750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
    Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of 3D conforming nickel titanium rotary instruments in eliminating canal wall bacteria from oval-shaped root canals.
    Bortoluzzi EA; Carlon D; Meghil MM; El-Awady AR; Niu L; Bergeron BE; Susin L; Cutler CW; Pashley DH; Tay FR
    J Dent; 2015 May; 43(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 25593001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of Dentaport ZX apex locator in enlarged root canals.
    Ebrahim AK; Wadachi R; Suda H
    Aust Dent J; 2007 Sep; 52(3):193-7. PubMed ID: 17969287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of cervical preflaring of root canal on determination of initial apical file using Gates Glidden drills, Protaper, Race and diamond-coated Galaxy files.
    Ashwini TS; Bhandari S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jul; 13(4):554-8. PubMed ID: 23151709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.