BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9207492)

  • 41. Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports?
    Khorasani R; Bates DW; Teeger S; Rothschild JM; Adams DF; Seltzer SE
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Jun; 10(6):685-8. PubMed ID: 12809424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical decision support system recommendations: how often do radiologists and clinicians accept them?
    Saban M; Sosna J; Singer C; Vaknin S; Myers V; Shaham D; Assaf J; Hershko A; Feder-Bubis P; Wilf-Miron R; Luxenburg O
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Jun; 32(6):4218-4224. PubMed ID: 35024948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Checking the facts. Radiologists' efforts aim to defend use of imaging.
    Lee J
    Mod Healthc; 2013 Feb; 43(8):7, 16. PubMed ID: 23516781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Do oncologists prefer subspecialty radiology reports? A quality care study.
    Rizzo S; Del Grande M; Espeli V; Stathis A; Nicolino GM; Del Grande F
    Insights Imaging; 2021 May; 12(1):64. PubMed ID: 34037872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Pilot study of a new comprehensive radiology report categorization (RADCAT) system in the emergency department.
    Swenson DW; Baird GL; Portelli DC; Mainiero MB; Movson JS
    Emerg Radiol; 2018 Apr; 25(2):139-145. PubMed ID: 29119408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Interrater variation in scoring radiological discrepancies.
    Mucci B; Murray H; Downie A; Osborne K
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 86(1028):20130245. PubMed ID: 23833035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The reliability of assessing the appropriateness of requested diagnostic tests.
    Bindels R; Hasman A; van Wersch JW; Pop P; Winkens RA
    Med Decis Making; 2003; 23(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12583453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The reliability of radiologists' quality assessment of MR pelvic scans.
    Wright JG; McCauley TR; Bell SM; McCarthy S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1992; 16(4):592-6. PubMed ID: 1629419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Same-specialty referrals for imaging compared with referrals to radiologists: are the data correct?
    Levin DC; Rao VM
    Radiology; 2008 May; 247(2):592; discussion 592-4. PubMed ID: 18430887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. National audit on the appropriateness of CT and MRI examinations in Luxembourg.
    Bouëtté A; Karoussou-Schreiner A; Ducou Le Pointe H; Grieten M; de Kerviler E; Rausin L; Bouëtté JC; Majerus P
    Insights Imaging; 2019 May; 10(1):54. PubMed ID: 31111303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Agreement Between International Radiologists on the Appropriateness and Urgency in Lumbar Spine MRI Referrals.
    Alanazi AH; Cradock A; Toomey R; Galligan M; Ryan J; Stowe J; Rainford L
    Int J Gen Med; 2022; 15():6315-6324. PubMed ID: 35924176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A Day in the Life of MRI: The Variety and Appropriateness of Exams Being Performed in Canada.
    Vanderby S; Badea A; Peña Sánchez JN; Kalra N; Babyn P
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2018 May; 69(2):151-161. PubMed ID: 29198819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Appropriateness: analysis of outpatient radiology requests.
    Cristofaro M; Busi Rizzi E; Schininà V; Chiappetta D; Angeletti C; Bibbolino C
    Radiol Med; 2012 Mar; 117(2):322-32. PubMed ID: 21892709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The value of consultation among radiologists.
    Hillman BJ; Swensson RG; Hessel SJ; Gerson DE; Herman PG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1976 Nov; 127(5):807-9. PubMed ID: 973668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. ChatGPT-4 Assistance in Optimizing Emergency Department Radiology Referrals and Imaging Selection.
    Barash Y; Klang E; Konen E; Sorin V
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2023 Oct; 20(10):998-1003. PubMed ID: 37423350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Vetting requests for body computed tomography.
    Harrison RL; Housden B; Hay C; Dixon AK
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(6):1015-8. PubMed ID: 10879721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Appropriate imaging utilization in Japan: a survey of accredited radiology training hospitals.
    Kumamaru KK; Murayama S; Yamashita Y; Nojo T; Watanabe Y; Goto M; Maeda E; Echigo J; Soga S; Fujii S; Tanami Y; Okabe T; Okada M; Munechika J; Ota H; Miyake M; Honda H; Aoki S
    Jpn J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 35(11):648-654. PubMed ID: 28916887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The Value of Imaging Part II: Value beyond Image Interpretation.
    Duong PA; Pastel DA; Sadigh G; Ballard D; Sullivan JC; Bresnahan B; Buch K; Duszak R
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 26683509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. From imaging gatekeeper to service provider--a transatlantic journey.
    Jha S
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Jul; 369(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 23822775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Double Reading of Outsourced CT/MR Radiology Reports: Retrospective Analysis.
    Vendrell JF; Frandon J; Boussat B; Cotton F; Ferretti G; Sans N; Tasu JP; Beregi JP; Larbi A
    J Patient Saf; 2021 Dec; 17(8):e1267-e1271. PubMed ID: 30531236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.