These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9207904)

  • 1. Skin sensitization thresholds: determination in predictive models.
    Basketter DA; Cookman G; Gerberick GF; Hamaide N; Potokar M
    Food Chem Toxicol; 1997; 35(3-4):417-25. PubMed ID: 9207904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
    Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
    Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quantitative approach to assess the potency of skin sensitizers in the elicitation phase.
    Ezendam J; Vermeulen JP; de Klerk A; de Jong WH; van Loveren H
    Toxicology; 2012 Sep; 299(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 22564262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Thresholds in contact sensitization: immunologic mechanisms and experimental evidence in humans--an overview.
    Boukhman MP; Maibach HI
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2001 Dec; 39(12):1125-34. PubMed ID: 11696387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
    Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting thresholds in allergic contact dermatitis: safety and regulatory considerations.
    Basketter DA; Evans P; Gerberick GF; Kimber IA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Jul; 47(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12225405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency.
    Basketter DA; Balikie L; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Harvey P; Evans P; White IR; Rycroft RJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Jun; 42(6):344-8. PubMed ID: 10871098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals.
    Kimber I; Basketter DA; Butler M; Gamer A; Garrigue JL; Gerberick GF; Newsome C; Steiling W; Vohr HW
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2003 Dec; 41(12):1799-809. PubMed ID: 14563405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.
    Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16938465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds.
    Basketter DA; Clapp C; Jefferies D; Safford B; Ryan CA; Gerberick F; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Nov; 53(5):260-7. PubMed ID: 16283904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.
    Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA; Wright Z; Marks JG
    Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benchmarking performance of SENS-IS assay against weight of evidence skin sensitization potency categories.
    Na M; O'Brien D; Gerberick GF; Kern PS; Lavelle M; Lee I; Parakhia R; Ryan C; Api AM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2022 Apr; 130():105128. PubMed ID: 35104615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
    Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
    J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skin irritation and sensitization: mechanisms and new approaches for risk assessment.
    Basketter D; Darlenski R; Fluhr JW
    Skin Pharmacol Physiol; 2008; 21(4):191-202. PubMed ID: 18509253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.
    Jowsey IR; Clapp CJ; Safford B; Gibbons BT; Basketter DA
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18568891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation between experimental human and murine skin sensitization induction thresholds.
    Api AM; Basketter D; Lalko J
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2015; 34(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 25430073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk.
    Robinson MK; Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; McNamee P; White IR; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2000 May; 42(5):251-9. PubMed ID: 10789838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-enzymatic glutathione reactivity and in vitro toxicity: a non-animal approach to skin sensitization.
    Aptula AO; Patlewicz G; Roberts DW; Schultz TW
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Mar; 20(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 16112535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro approaches to the identification and characterization of skin sensitizers.
    Basketter D; Maxwell G
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):359-73. PubMed ID: 18058309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-animal test methods for predicting skin sensitization potentials.
    Mehling A; Eriksson T; Eltze T; Kolle S; Ramirez T; Teubner W; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Arch Toxicol; 2012 Aug; 86(8):1273-95. PubMed ID: 22707154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.