259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9209200)
21. Is the determination of LDL cholesterol according to Friedewald accurate in CAPD and HD patients?
Nauck M; Krämer-Guth A; Bartens W; März W; Wieland H; Wanner C
Clin Nephrol; 1996 Nov; 46(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 8953121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of direct and indirect measurement of LDL-C in HIV-infected individuals: ACTG 5087.
Evans SR; Fichtenbaum CJ; Aberg JA;
HIV Clin Trials; 2007; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17434848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Performance of Calculated and Directly Measured Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in a Pediatric Population.
Roper SM; Cao J; Tam E; Devaraj S
Am J Clin Pathol; 2017 Jul; 148(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 28575159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fasting Versus Nonfasting and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Accuracy.
Sathiyakumar V; Park J; Golozar A; Lazo M; Quispe R; Guallar E; Blumenthal RS; Jones SR; Martin SS
Circulation; 2018 Jan; 137(1):10-19. PubMed ID: 29038168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validation of the Friedewald formula for the estimation of low density lipoprotein cholesterol in a sub-Saharan African population.
Choukem SP; Manases T; Nda-Mefoo JP; Dimala CA; Mboue-Djieka Y; Sobngwi E; Kengne AP
Clin Biochem; 2018 Mar; 53():25-30. PubMed ID: 29273329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of friedewald formula and modified friedewald formula with direct homogeneous assay for low density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation.
Anwar M; Khan DA; Khan FA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Jan; 24(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 24411534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of a novel method vs the Friedewald equation for estimating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels from the standard lipid profile.
Martin SS; Blaha MJ; Elshazly MB; Toth PP; Kwiterovich PO; Blumenthal RS; Jones SR
JAMA; 2013 Nov; 310(19):2061-8. PubMed ID: 24240933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Friedewald formula underestimates LDL cholesterol at low concentrations.
Scharnagl H; Nauck M; Wieland H; März W
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2001 May; 39(5):426-31. PubMed ID: 11434393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of Martin's equation for LDL-C estimation in type 2 diabetes mellitus Egyptian patients.
Esawy MM; Shabana MA; Magdy MM
Clin Chim Acta; 2019 Aug; 495():487-492. PubMed ID: 31145894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol equations in patients with dyslipidaemia receiving cholesterol ester transfer protein inhibition.
Martin SS; Ditmarsch M; Simmons M; Alp N; Turner T; Davidson MH; Kastelein JJP
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother; 2023 Feb; 9(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 36307922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of 23 Equations for Estimating LDL Cholesterol in a Clinical Laboratory Database of 5,051,467 Patients.
Samuel C; Park J; Sajja A; Michos ED; Blumenthal RS; Jones SR; Martin SS
Glob Heart; 2023; 18(1):36. PubMed ID: 37361322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation and clinical application of a direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol assay in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic adults.
Yu HH; Ginsburg GS; Harris N; Rifai N
Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(10):1295-9. PubMed ID: 9388101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluating the atherogenic burden of individuals with a Friedewald-estimated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dL compared with a novel low-density lipoprotein estimation method.
Whelton SP; Meeusen JW; Donato LJ; Jaffe AS; Saenger A; Sokoll LJ; Blumenthal RS; Jones SR; Martin SS
J Clin Lipidol; 2017; 11(4):1065-1072. PubMed ID: 28826567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Discordance Between Standard Equations for Determination of LDL Cholesterol in Patients With Atherosclerosis.
Sajja A; Li HF; Spinelli KJ; Blumenthal RS; Virani SS; Martin SS; Gluckman TJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2022 Feb; 79(6):530-541. PubMed ID: 35144744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation by a new formula in Indian population.
Anandaraja S; Narang R; Godeswar R; Laksmy R; Talwar KK
Int J Cardiol; 2005 Jun; 102(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 15939107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Concentrations by Direct Measurement and by Friedewald Calculation.
Sung KC; Kwon CH; Lee MY; Kwon MJ; Lee JH; Jung MH; Shin JH
Am J Cardiol; 2020 Mar; 125(6):866-873. PubMed ID: 31928718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accurate direct determination of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol using an immunoseparation reagent and enzymatic cholesterol assay.
Pisani T; Gebski CP; Leary ET; Warnick GR; Ollington JF
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Dec; 119(12):1127-35. PubMed ID: 7503661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Applicability of Martin-Hopkins formula and comparison with Friedewald formula for estimated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in e_COR study population.
Ferrinho C; Alves AC; Bourbon M; Duarte S
Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2021 Oct; 40(10):715-724. PubMed ID: 34857108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A direct measurement for LDL-cholesterol increases hypercholesterolemia prevalence: comparison with Friedewald calculation.
Kamezaki F; Sonoda S; Nakata S; Otsuji Y
J UOEH; 2010 Sep; 32(3):211-20. PubMed ID: 20857815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of the Estimation of Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol by the Modified Friedewald Equation in Ethnic Chinese Adults Living in Taiwan.
Huey-Jen Hsu S; Chen MF; Chen DR; Su TC
Intern Med; 2015; 54(18):2291-7. PubMed ID: 26370851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
