286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9211092)
1. [Assessment of auscultatory blood pressure measurements versus intra-arterial pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation].
Ochiai H; Mitake A; Miyata T; Ishigami T; Ashino K; Sumita S; Miyazaki N; Ishii M
J Cardiol; 1997 Jun; 29(6):331-6. PubMed ID: 9211092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of noninvasive blood pressure measurements in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Anastas ZM; Jimerson E; Garolis S
J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2008; 23(6):519-24; quiz 525-6. PubMed ID: 18953216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Auscultatory measurement of arterial pressure during anaesthesia: a reassessment of Korotkoff sounds.
Pereira E; Prys-Roberts C; Dagnino J; Anger C; Cooper GM; Hutton P
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1985 Mar; 2(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 4018039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Korotkoff sound versus oscillometric cuff sphygmomanometers: comparison between auscultatory and DynaPulse blood pressure measurements.
Chio SS; Urbina EM; Lapointe J; Tsai J; Berenson GS
J Am Soc Hypertens; 2011; 5(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 21269907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of indirect and direct blood pressure measurements with Osler's manoeuvre in elderly hypertensive patients.
Lewis RR; Evans PJ; McNabb WR; Padayachee TS
J Hum Hypertens; 1994 Dec; 8(12):879-85. PubMed ID: 7884785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated blood pressure measurement in special situations: patients with chronic atrial fibrillation or chronic aortic regurgitation.
Eckert S; Gleichmann S; Gleichmann U
Z Kardiol; 1996; 85 Suppl 3():92-8. PubMed ID: 8896307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparison of 3 methods of blood pressure measurement in obesity].
Julien J; Pagny JY; Jeunemaitre X; Fouqueray B; Plouin PF; Corvol P
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1988 Jun; 81 Spec No():241-5. PubMed ID: 3142414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Measurement of arterial pressure using 3 measurement methods in medial arterial calcification].
Thierry FX; Dueymes JM; Vernier I; Barbe P; Berg P; Dumazer P; Lumbroso C; Conte JJ
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1989 Jul; 82(7):1007-11. PubMed ID: 2510622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The accuracy of automated blood pressure measuring devices in patients with controlled atrial fibrillation.
Stewart MJ; Gough K; Padfield PL
J Hypertens; 1995 Mar; 13(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 7622850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Measurement of arterial blood pressure using the sphygmomanometer-S and the direct method].
Sapiński A; Szuman J; Jasiński J
Kardiol Pol; 1991; 35(9):174-6. PubMed ID: 1753563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Arm position and blood pressure: a risk factor for hypertension?
Mourad A; Carney S; Gillies A; Jones B; Nanra R; Trevillian P
J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Jun; 17(6):389-95. PubMed ID: 12764401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reintroduction of Riva-Rocci measurements to determine systolic blood pressure?
Verrij E; van Montfrans G; Bos WJ
Neth J Med; 2008 Dec; 66(11):480-2. PubMed ID: 19075314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of the Microlife Watch BP Office professional device for office blood pressure measurement according to the International protocol.
Stergiou GS; Tzamouranis D; Protogerou A; Nasothimiou E; Kapralos C
Blood Press Monit; 2008 Oct; 13(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 18799957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
Landgraf J; Wishner SH; Kloner RA
Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A validation of the data obtained with the simultaneous recording of blood pressure and the 24-hour electrocardiogram].
Germanò G; Caparra A; Valentino S; Coia F; Federico L; Santucci A
Cardiologia; 1993 Jun; 38(6):383-92. PubMed ID: 8402748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
