174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9212529)
1. Congressional action to amend Federal Rule of Evidence 702: a mischievous attempt to codify Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Farrell NS
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1997; 13(2):523-51. PubMed ID: 9212529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: active judicial scrutiny of scientific evidence.
Kirsch EW
Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(2):213-34. PubMed ID: 10342992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow: missed opportunity.
Jackson KA
Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(1):71-93. PubMed ID: 10342987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
Zonana H
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What has a decade of Daubert wrought?
Berger MA
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S59-65. PubMed ID: 16030340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Daubert v Merrell Dow: scientific evidence in the courtroom.
Klein RD
JAMA; 1994 May; 271(20):1578. PubMed ID: 8182809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A Daubert motion: a legal strategy to exclude essential scientific evidence in toxic tort litigation.
Melnick RL
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S30-4. PubMed ID: 16030335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trial and error: the Supreme Court's philosophy of science.
Haack S
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S66-73. PubMed ID: 16030341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating science outside the trial box: applying Daubert to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines' criminal history score.
Krauss DA
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2006; 29(4):289-305. PubMed ID: 16530267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A cognitive scientist looks at Daubert.
Lakoff GP
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S114-20. PubMed ID: 16030326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Law's knowledge: science for justice in legal settings.
Jasanoff S
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S49-58. PubMed ID: 16030338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Regulatory parallels to Daubert: stakeholder influence, "sound science," and the delayed adoption of health-protective standards.
Neff RA; Goldman LR
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S81-91. PubMed ID: 16030344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lessons from Canadian Courts for All Expert Witnesses.
Booth BD; Watts J; Dufour M
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Aug; 47(3):278-285. PubMed ID: 31097525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert.
Cecil JS
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S74-80. PubMed ID: 16030342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Cutter incident, 50 years later.
Offit PA
N Engl J Med; 2005 Apr; 352(14):1411-2. PubMed ID: 15814877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The perils of relying on interested parties to evaluate scientific quality.
Wagner W
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S99-106. PubMed ID: 16030346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The expert medical witness in legal perspective.
Cohen FL
J Leg Med; 2004 Jun; 25(2):185-209. PubMed ID: 15204905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Liability for the psychiatrist expert witness.
Binder RL
Am J Psychiatry; 2002 Nov; 159(11):1819-25. PubMed ID: 12411212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Daubert v Merrell Dow. The Supreme Court tackles scientific evidence in the courtroom.
Gold JA; Zaremski MJ; Lev ER; Shefrin DH
JAMA; 1993 Dec 22-29; 270(24):2964-7. PubMed ID: 8018140
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The (near) irrelevance of Daubert to criminal justice and some suggestions for reform.
Neufeld PJ
Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S107-13. PubMed ID: 16030325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
