162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9212599)
1. De facto gatekeeping and informed consent in intensive care.
Burrows RC; Hodgson RE
Med Law; 1997; 16(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 9212599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Limiting and refraining from treatment from the legal viewpoint in intensive care medicine].
Opderbecke HW
Zentralbl Chir; 1994; 119(3):201-3. PubMed ID: 8178589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ethical principles in critical care.
Luce JM
JAMA; 1990 Feb; 263(5):696-700. PubMed ID: 2296126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomedical ethics and the withdrawal of advanced life support.
Henig NR; Faul JL; Raffin TA
Annu Rev Med; 2001; 52():79-92. PubMed ID: 11160769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interview assessment of critically Ill patients regarding resuscitation decisions. A case study in ethics research.
Amchin J; Perry S; Manevitz A; Cella D; Miller D
Gen Hosp Psychiatry; 1989 Mar; 11(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 2707588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Legal issues of physician-assisted euthanasia. Part III--Passive euthanasia, comparison of international legislation, conclusions for medical practice].
Laux J; Röbel A; Parzeller M
Arch Kriminol; 2013; 231(3-4):73-115. PubMed ID: 23678624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Consumer sovereignty vs. informed consent: saying no to requests to "do everything" for dying patients.
Weber LJ
Bus Prof Ethics J; 1990; 9(3 and 4):95-102. PubMed ID: 11651037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Substitute consent. Reconciling negative treatment and consent to routine medical treatment.
Sappington GM
J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):341-55. PubMed ID: 3490528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Egregious inaction: five years later after Of Life and Death.
Downie J
Health Law Rev; 2000; 9(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15706705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Removal of life support in intensive care units.
Burrows R
Med Law; 1994; 13(5-6):489-500. PubMed ID: 7845179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcome predictors in the early withdrawal of life support: issues of justice and allocation for the severely brain injured.
Toms SA
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 8219304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The right to live and the right to die].
Zeeh J
MMW Fortschr Med; 2014 Apr; 156(6):45-8; quiz 49-50. PubMed ID: 24919297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient autonomy and "death with dignity": some clinical caveats.
Jackson DL; Youngner S
N Engl J Med; 1979 Aug; 301(8):404-8. PubMed ID: 460342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Care of critically ill newborns. The Israeli experience.
Eidelman AI
J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):247-61. PubMed ID: 7636405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Baby T.
Goldstein DA
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1992; 1(4):345-8. PubMed ID: 1342354
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of psychiatric consultation liaison nurses in ethical decisions to remove life-sustaining treatments.
Hart CA
Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 1990 Dec; 4(6):370-8. PubMed ID: 2285330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Allowing patients to decide.
Franklin C
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 1993; 2(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 11643203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent and the elderly. An ethical challenge for critical care nursing.
Buehler DA
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am; 1990 Sep; 2(3):461-71. PubMed ID: 2264971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Life-sustaining technologies: value issues.
Kapp MB
J Soc Issues; 1993; 49(2):151-67. PubMed ID: 17167919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
