These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic value of laboratory studies]. van der Helm HJ; Hische EA Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1979 Nov; 123(45):1944-51. PubMed ID: 514383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Risk or advantage with repeated tests?]. Helander A Lakartidningen; 1997 Aug; 94(32-33):2717. PubMed ID: 9289573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The predictive value theory redefines quality assurance. Mass D; Galen RS Am J Med Technol; 1981 Dec; 47(12):965-70. PubMed ID: 7332018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The predictive value of laboratory testing. Galen RS Orthop Clin North Am; 1979 Apr; 10(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 450408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [The sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of diagnostic tests]. Rümke CL Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1983 Mar; 127(13):556-61. PubMed ID: 6843704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The interpretation of laboratory tests. Corman LC Prim Care; 1980 Dec; 7(4):691-702. PubMed ID: 6908088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [The pediatrician, his laboratory and its uncertainty]. Boulat O Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2002 Dec; 122(12):645-8. PubMed ID: 12611193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Internal quality control : false-rejections and preliminary period]. Marquis P Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2001; 59(2):214-8. PubMed ID: 11282527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The predictive value of diagnostic procedures. Gelmann GR Nurse Pract; 1985 Mar; 10(3):25, 28-30, 32 passim. PubMed ID: 3982717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A guide to NIDA certification for workplace drug testing. Armbruster DA MLO Med Lab Obs; 1992 Feb; 24(2):31-2, 34, 36. PubMed ID: 10171052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Attending physician must consider uncertainty. Don't let yourself be cheated by the numbers!]. Kallner A Lakartidningen; 2006 Aug 30-Sep 5; 103(35):2467-9. PubMed ID: 17002162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Standardization of clinical laboratory testing in Japan]. Hamasaki N Rinsho Byori; 2006 Sep; 54(9):936-9. PubMed ID: 17063875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interpretation of laboratory tests. N Engl J Med; 1979 Feb; 300(8):438-40. PubMed ID: 759929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of pooled samples. Keeler E; Berwick D Health Lab Sci; 1976 Apr; 13(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 1270261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Great number of non-recorded cases of analytical interference. Unexpected and misinterpreted laboratory levels can result in diagnostic and therapeutic errors]. Lindstedt G; Ekman R; Forberg R; Isaksson A; Stridsberg M; Hård L; Nordin G; Nyström E Lakartidningen; 2002 May; 99(22):2492-4. PubMed ID: 12092048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [The test diagram, a visual aid in the interpretation of tests results]. Baggen JL; Leffers P; van Leeuwen YD Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1984 Sep; 128(35):1656-9. PubMed ID: 6483037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]