628 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9215186)
21. Stereotactic fine-needle aspiration cytology of nonpalpable breast lesions: initial experience in a tertiary-care institution.
Iles SE; MacGregor JH; Bodurtha AJ; Bernardo AI; Daniels C
Can Assoc Radiol J; 1994 Feb; 45(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 8118712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The positive predictive value of mammographic signs: a review of 425 non-palpable breast lesions.
Burrell HC; Pinder SE; Wilson AR; Evans AJ; Yeoman LJ; Elston CW; Ellis IO
Clin Radiol; 1996 Apr; 51(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 8617041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Diagnosis of non-palpable breast lesions: contribution of cytological punctures after stereotaxic localization].
Meunier M; Le Gal M; Klijanienko J; Vielh P; Neuenschwander S; Durand JC; Asselain B
J Radiol; 1995 May; 76(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 7783038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Solid nonpalpable breast lesions. Success and failure of guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in a consecutive series of 2444 cases.
Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M; Ambrogetti D; Bravetti P; Catarzi S; Morrone D; Cariaggi MP
Acta Radiol; 1997 Sep; 38(5):815-20. PubMed ID: 9332236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fine needle aspiration cytology of palpable breast lesions. Histologic subtype in false negative cases.
Park IA; Ham EK
Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(4):1131-8. PubMed ID: 9250310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A prospective comparison of stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration versus stereotaxic core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities.
Symmans WF; Weg N; Gross J; Cangiarella JF; Tata M; Mazzo JA; Waisman J
Cancer; 1999 Mar; 85(5):1119-32. PubMed ID: 10091797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy by surgeons: minimum 2-year follow-up of benign lesions.
Burns RP; Brown JP; Roe SM; Sprouse LR; Yancey AE; Witherspoon LE
Ann Surg; 2000 Oct; 232(4):542-8. PubMed ID: 10998652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of impalpable breast lesions in a rural setting. Comparison of cytology with imaging and final outcome.
Zardawi IM; Hearnden F; Meyer P; Trevan B
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 10097704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Stereotaxic localization for fine-needle aspiration breast biopsy. Initial experience with 300 patients.
Mitnick JS; Vazquez MF; Roses DF; Harris MN; Gianutsos R; Waisman J
Arch Surg; 1991 Sep; 126(9):1137-40. PubMed ID: 1656912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Atypical and suspicious categories in fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast: histological and mammographical correlation and clinical significance.
Chaiwun B; Sukhamwang N; Lekawanvijit S; Sukapan K; Rangdaeng S; Muttarak M; Thorner PS
Singapore Med J; 2005 Dec; 46(12):706-9. PubMed ID: 16308644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Diagnostic framework of nonpalpable lesions of the breast].
Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M
Chir Ital; 1995; 47(4):5-8. PubMed ID: 9005133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Nonpalpable breast lesions: pathologic correlation of ultrasonographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
Saarela AO; Kiviniemi HO; Rissanen TJ; Paloneva TK
J Ultrasound Med; 1996 Aug; 15(8):549-53; quiz 555-6. PubMed ID: 8839401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of fine needle aspiration for solid breast lesions is accurate and cost-effective.
Rubin M; Horiuchi K; Joy N; Haun W; Read R; Ratzer E; Fenoglio M
Am J Surg; 1997 Dec; 174(6):694-6; discussion 697-8. PubMed ID: 9409599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The accuracy of malignant diagnoses established by fine needle aspiration cytologic procedures of mammary masses.
Nicastri GR; Reed WP; Dziura BR
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Jun; 172(6):457-60. PubMed ID: 2035134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Combined fine-needle aspiration, physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer.
Steinberg JL; Trudeau ME; Ryder DE; Fishell E; Chapman JA; McCready DR; Fish EB; Hiraki GY; Ross TM; Lickley LA
Can J Surg; 1996 Aug; 39(4):302-11. PubMed ID: 8697321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The accuracy of mammography: a comparison with fine needle aspiration cytology.
Charnvises S
J Med Assoc Thai; 1996 Jan; 79(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 8867398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mammography-guided stereotactic fine-needle aspiration cytology of nonpalpable breast lesions: prospective comparison with surgical biopsy results.
Fajardo LL; Davis JR; Wiens JL; Trego DC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Nov; 155(5):977-81. PubMed ID: 2120967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accuracy of aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast disease.
Smallwood J; Herbert A; Guyer P; Taylor I
Br J Surg; 1985 Oct; 72(10):841-3. PubMed ID: 4041719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Combined assessment (aspiration cytology and mammography) of clinically suspicious breast masses.
van Wyk WF; Dent DM; Hacking EA; Learmonth G; Kottler RE; Gudgeon CA; Tiltman A
S Afr Med J; 1995 Feb; 85(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 7597539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fine needle aspiration cytology of breast lesions: a clinicocytologic review of 1211 cases.
Taye AA; Gemechu T
Ethiop Med J; 1998 Oct; 36(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 11957297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
