These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9215204)

  • 1. A randomized controlled trial of a new fetal acoustic stimulation test for fetal well-being.
    Marden D; McDuffie RS; Allen R; Abitz D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 176(6):1386-8. PubMed ID: 9215204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Platt LD; Broussard P; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jul; 155(1):131-4. PubMed ID: 3524234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vibroacoustic stimulation and nursing intervention in the nonstress test.
    Auyeung RM; Goldkrand JW
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1991; 20(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 2056360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. III. Predictive value of a reactive test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Broussard P; Paul RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Feb; 33(2):217-8. PubMed ID: 3351822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of vibroacoustic stimulation on the nonstress test at gestational ages of thirty-two weeks or less.
    Druzin ML; Edersheim TG; Hutson JM; Bond AL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Dec; 161(6 Pt 1):1476-8. PubMed ID: 2603902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The role of vibroacoustic stimulation in antenatal fetal assessment].
    Leis Marquez MT; Hernández Andrade E; Maya Goldsmit D; Pérez de la Huerta MI; López García RB
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1993 Dec; 61():356-9. PubMed ID: 8119607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prognostic components of the nonreactive nonstress test.
    Ingardia CJ; Cetrulo CL; Knuppel RA; Kappy KA; Scerbo JC; Lake M; Aumann G
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 7422169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does Doppler-detected fetal movement decrease the incidence of nonreactive nonstress tests?
    Stanco LM; Rabello Y; Medearis AL; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 82(6):999-1003. PubMed ID: 8233279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The fetal acoustic stimulation test: a reliable and cost effective method of antepartum fetal monitoring.
    Batcha TM; Goonewardene IM
    Ceylon Med J; 2005 Dec; 50(4):156-9. PubMed ID: 16538910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical study on detecting false non-reactive of non-stress test by improved acoustic stimulation.
    Xi Q; Du J; Liu X; Shao L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 20677022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using fetal acoustic stimulation to shorten the biophysical profile.
    Pinette MG; Blackstone J; Wax JR; Cartin A
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2005 Jun; 33(5):223-5. PubMed ID: 16047387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Position of the vibroacoustic stimulator does not affect fetal response.
    Eller DP; Robinson LJ; Newman RB
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Oct; 167(4 Pt 1):1137-9. PubMed ID: 1415406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antepartum fetal wellbeing.
    Chutiwongse S; Tannirandorn Y; Sukcharoen N; Witoonpanich P; Snidvongs W; Phaosavasdi S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1991 May; 74(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 1783873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fetal response to vibratory acoustic stimulation in periods of low heart rate reactivity and low activity.
    Ohel G; Birkenfeld A; Rabinowitz R; Sadovsky E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Mar; 154(3):619-21. PubMed ID: 3513589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Population differences affect the interpretation of fetal nonstress test results.
    Johnson TR; Paine LL; Strobino DM; Witter FR
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Sep; 179(3 Pt 1):779-83. PubMed ID: 9757989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fetal vibro-acoustic stimulation with a can--a clinical study.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Lawrie TA; de Jager M; da Ponte A
    S Afr Med J; 1998 Feb; 88(2 Suppl):199-200, 203. PubMed ID: 9542487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the effects of acoustic stimulation and feeding mother stimulation on non-reactive non-stress test: a randomized clinical trial.
    Hasanpour S; Raouf S; Shamsalizadeh N; Bani S; Ghojazadeh M; Sheikhan F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 287(6):1105-10. PubMed ID: 23329342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Zimmer EZ; Divon MY
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Mar; 81(3):451-7. PubMed ID: 8437804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antenatal fetal health.
    Arulkumaran S; Anandakumar C; Wong YC; Ratnam SS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Feb; 73(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 2911425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of visual and computerized interpretation of nonstress test results in a randomized controlled trial.
    Bracero LA; Morgan S; Byrne DW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 1):1254-8. PubMed ID: 10561655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.