217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9215977)
1. Validation of an optoelectronic limb volumeter (Perometer).
Stanton AW; Northfield JW; Holroyd B; Mortimer PS; Levick JR
Lymphology; 1997 Jun; 30(2):77-97. PubMed ID: 9215977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring Limb Volume: Accuracy and Reliability of Tape Measurement Versus Perometer Measurement.
Sharkey AR; King SW; Kuo RY; Bickerton SB; Ramsden AJ; Furniss D
Lymphat Res Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):182-186. PubMed ID: 28956715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of breast cancer-related arm lymphedema--comparison of physical measurement methods and self-report.
Czerniec SA; Ward LC; Refshauge KM; Beith J; Lee MJ; York S; Kilbreath SL
Cancer Invest; 2010 Jan; 28(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19916749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study between mobile infrared optoelectronic volumetry with a Perometer and two commonly used methods for the evaluation of arm volume in patients with breast cancer related lymphedema of the arm.
Adriaenssens N; Buyl R; Lievens P; Fontaine C; Lamote J
Lymphology; 2013 Sep; 46(3):132-43. PubMed ID: 24645536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the inverse water volumetry method: A new gold standard for arm volume measurements.
Damstra RJ; Glazenburg EJ; Hop WC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Oct; 99(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 16752072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A simple and innovative device to measure arm volume at home for patients with lymphedema after breast cancer.
Lette J
J Clin Oncol; 2006 Dec; 24(34):5434-40. PubMed ID: 17135645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurement of lower limb volume: agreement between the vertically oriented perometer and a tape measure method.
Tan CW; Coutts F; Bulley C
Physiotherapy; 2013 Sep; 99(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 23351956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity for the simplified water displacement instrument to measure arm lymphedema as a result of breast cancer surgery.
Sagen A; Kåresen R; Skaane P; Risberg MA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2009 May; 90(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 19406300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Defining lower limb lymphedema after inguinal or ilio-inguinal dissection in patients with melanoma using classification and regression tree analysis.
Spillane AJ; Saw RP; Tucker M; Byth K; Thompson JF
Ann Surg; 2008 Aug; 248(2):286-93. PubMed ID: 18650640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The validity and reliability of the Perometer in evaluating human knee volume.
Man IO; Markland KL; Morrissey MC
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2004 Nov; 24(6):352-8. PubMed ID: 15522044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Forearm blood flow measured by venous occlusion plethysmography in healthy subjects and in women with postmastectomy oedema.
Stanton AW; Holroyd B; Northfield JW; Levick JR; Mortimer PS
Vasc Med; 1998; 3(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 9666525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability and concurrent validity of the perometer for measuring hand volume in women with and without lymphedema.
Lee MJ; Boland RA; Czerniec S; Kilbreath SL
Lymphat Res Biol; 2011 Mar; 9(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 21417763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of limb volume by manual and automated methods in patients with limb edema or lymphedema.
Mayrovitz HN; Sims N; Macdonald J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(6):272-6. PubMed ID: 12669673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concurrent validity of upper-extremity volume estimates: comparison of calculated volume derived from girth measurements and water displacement volume.
Karges JR; Mark BE; Stikeleather SJ; Worrell TW
Phys Ther; 2003 Feb; 83(2):134-45. PubMed ID: 12564949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Plethysmography with optoelectronic sensors: comparison with mercury strain gauge plethysmography.
Louisy F; Schroiff P
Aviat Space Environ Med; 1995 Dec; 66(12):1191-7. PubMed ID: 8747616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Voluminometric estimation of the degree of lymphedema and its therapy by pneumatic compression.
Swedborg I
Scand J Rehabil Med; 1977; 9(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 594690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement decisions for clinical assessment of limb volume changes in patients with bilateral and unilateral limb edema.
Mayrovitz HN; Macdonald J; Davey S; Olson K; Washington E
Phys Ther; 2007 Oct; 87(10):1362-8. PubMed ID: 17684090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and limits of agreement of circumferential, water displacement, and optoelectronic volumetry in the measurement of upper limb lymphedema.
Deltombe T; Jamart J; Recloux S; Legrand C; Vandenbroeck N; Theys S; Hanson P
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 17539462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A new device to measure upper limb circumferences: validity and reliability.
Devoogdt N; Lemkens H; Geraerts I; Van Nuland I; Flour M; Coremans T; Christiaens MR; Van Kampen M
Int Angiol; 2010 Oct; 29(5):401-7. PubMed ID: 20924341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Upper-extremity volume measurements in women with lymphedema: a comparison of measurements obtained via water displacement with geometrically determined volume.
Sander AP; Hajer NM; Hemenway K; Miller AC
Phys Ther; 2002 Dec; 82(12):1201-12. PubMed ID: 12444879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
