217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9215977)
21. [Comparison of different methods to quantify the volume of horse limbs].
Haase F; Siewert C; von Rautenfeld DB; Fischbach JU; Seifert H
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2009; 122(3-4):126-31. PubMed ID: 19350812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of upper limb volume measurement techniques and arm symptoms between healthy volunteers and individuals with known lymphedema.
Ridner SH; Montgomery LD; Hepworth JT; Stewart BR; Armer JM
Lymphology; 2007 Mar; 40(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17539463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Self-measurement of upper extremity volume in women post-breast cancer: reliability and validity study.
Mori T; Lustman A; Katz-Leurer M
Physiother Theory Pract; 2015 May; 31(4):283-7. PubMed ID: 25539094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Inter-rater reliability of arm circumference measurement.
Foroughi N; Dylke ES; Paterson RD; Sparrow KA; Fan J; Warwick EB; Kilbreath SL
Lymphat Res Biol; 2011; 9(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 21688979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reliability and validity of arm volume measurements for assessment of lymphedema.
Taylor R; Jayasinghe UW; Koelmeyer L; Ung O; Boyages J
Phys Ther; 2006 Feb; 86(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 16445334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Single frequency versus bioimpedance spectroscopy for the assessment of lymphedema.
York SL; Ward LC; Czerniec S; Lee MJ; Refshauge KM; Kilbreath SL
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Sep; 117(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 18563555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Alterations in forearm position and environmental temperature influences the segmental volume expansion during venous occlusion plethysmography--special attention on hand circulation.
Vedung T; Jorfeldt L; Henriksson J
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2009 Sep; 29(5):376-81. PubMed ID: 19522855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial of vitamin E and pentoxifylline in patients with chronic arm lymphoedema and fibrosis after surgery and radiotherapy for breast cancer.
Gothard L; Cornes P; Earl J; Hall E; MacLaren J; Mortimer P; Peacock J; Peckitt C; Woods M; Yarnold J
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Nov; 73(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 15542159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A clinically useful method for evaluating lymphedema.
Brown J
Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2004 Feb; 8(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 14983761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Venous capacity and drainage volumes of arm veins].
Hänsgen K; Podhaisky H; Sternitzky R
Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1991 Nov; 46(16):607-9. PubMed ID: 1792801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Normative volume difference between the dominant and nondominant upper limbs in healthy older women.
Dylke ES; Yee J; Ward LC; Foroughi N; Kilbreath SL
Lymphat Res Biol; 2012 Dec; 10(4):182-8. PubMed ID: 23240956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Venous occlusion plethysmography using a fiber-optic sensor.
Stenow EN; Oberg PA
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Mar; 40(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 8335332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Validity and intra- and interobserver reliability of an indirect volume measurements in patients with upper extremity lymphedema.
Meijer RS; Rietman JS; Geertzen JH; Bosmans JC; Dijkstra PU
Lymphology; 2004 Sep; 37(3):127-33. PubMed ID: 15560108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Measurement of upper extremity volume in women after axillary dissection for breast cancer.
Megens AM; Harris SR; Kim-Sing C; McKenzie DC
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Dec; 82(12):1639-44. PubMed ID: 11733875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Measurement of limb blood flow by electrical impedance plethysmography.
Porter JM; Swain ID; Shakespeare PG
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1985 May; 67(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 4004047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Measurement of limb volume: laser scanning versus volume displacement.
McKinnon JG; Wong V; Temple WJ; Galbraith C; Ferry P; Clynch GS; Clynch C
J Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 96(5):381-8. PubMed ID: 17477361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Surgical outcomes after breast cancer surgery: measuring acute lymphedema.
Kosir MA; Rymal C; Koppolu P; Hryniuk L; Darga L; Du W; Rice V; Mood D; Shakoor S; Wang W; Bedoyan J; Aref A; Biernat L; Northouse L
J Surg Res; 2001 Feb; 95(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 11162038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Infrared optoelectronic volumetry, the ideal way to measure limb volume.
Tierney S; Aslam M; Rennie K; Grace P
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1996 Nov; 12(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 8980428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Home volumetry foretells a new era of self-management for patients with lymphedema after breast cancer.
Lette J; Lette F; Fraser S
Lymphology; 2007 Dec; 40(4):185-7. PubMed ID: 18365533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessing Arm Volume in People During and After Treatment for Breast Cancer: Reliability and Convergent Validity of the LymphaTech System.
Binkley JM; Weiler MJ; Frank N; Bober L; Dixon JB; Stratford PW
Phys Ther; 2020 Mar; 100(3):457-467. PubMed ID: 32043125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
