These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 921606)

  • 1. Auditory processing of frequency ramps.
    Arlinger S
    Audiology; 1977; 16(6):480-6. PubMed ID: 921606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Slow evoked cortical responses to linear frequency ramps in subjects with cochlear lesions.
    Arlinger SD; Jerlvall LB; Ahrén T; Holmgren EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1977; 84(3-4):213-9. PubMed ID: 906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discrimination of frequency ramps in subjects with cochlear hearing loss.
    Arlinger SD; Jerlvall LB; Ahrén T; Holmgren EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1977; 83(3-4):310-6. PubMed ID: 857603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Slow evoked cortical responses to linear frequency ramps of a continuous pure tone.
    Arlinger SD; Jerlvall LB; Ahrén T; Holmgren EC
    Acta Physiol Scand; 1976 Dec; 98(4):412-24. PubMed ID: 998292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Thresholds for linear frequency ramps of a continuous pure tone.
    Arlinger SD; Jerlvall LB; Ahrén T; Holmgren EC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1977; 83(3-4):317-27. PubMed ID: 857604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing investigation in relation to the duration of acoustic signals.
    Abramovich SJ
    Laryngoscope; 1978 Feb; 88(2 Pt 1):334-41. PubMed ID: 621999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Middle components of the AER to tone-pips in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    McFarland WH; Vivion MC; Goldstein R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Dec; 20(4):781-98. PubMed ID: 604690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain stem response audiometry at speech frequencies.
    Kodera K; Yamane H; Yamada O; Suzuki JI
    Audiology; 1977; 16(6):469-79. PubMed ID: 921605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pure tone auditory thresholds can change according to duration of interrupted tones in patients with psychogenic hearing loss.
    Oishi N; Inoue Y; Hori A; Yakushimaru R; Kohno N; Ogawa K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 131(6):628-32. PubMed ID: 21254959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrophysiological investigation of auditory recruitment by averaged electroencephalographic-evoked response.
    Uziel A; Seneclause S
    Audiology; 1978; 17(2):141-51. PubMed ID: 646731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Plasticity of tonotopic maps in humans: influence of hearing loss, hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Thai-Van H; Veuillet E; Norena A; Guiraud J; Collet L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar; 130(3):333-7. PubMed ID: 19845491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency selectivity and thresholds of brief stimuli suitable for electric response audiometry.
    Davis H; Hirsh SK; Popelka GR; Formby C
    Audiology; 1984; 23(1):59-74. PubMed ID: 6704060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early tone-evoked responses in normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Stillman RD; Moushegian G; Rupert AL
    Audiology; 1976; 15(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 1252187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiological measures of auditory perception.
    Antonelli AR
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1976 Nov; 97 Suppl():613-21. PubMed ID: 1019446
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Loudness perception and frequency discrimination in subjects with steeply sloping hearing loss: possible correlates of neural plasticity.
    McDermott HJ; Lech M; Kornblum MS; Irvine DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2314-25. PubMed ID: 10491696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiologic correlates of intensity discrimination in cortical evoked potentials of younger and older adults.
    Harris KC; Mills JH; Dubno JR
    Hear Res; 2007 Jun; 228(1-2):58-68. PubMed ID: 17344001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intensity and frequency discrimination monitored by evoked response audiometry: clinical application.
    Antonelli AR; Sambataro G; Gaini R
    Audiology; 1976; 15(6):508-13. PubMed ID: 962713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evoked cerebral potential audiometry and hearing threshold.
    Prevec TS; Cernelc S; Ribaric K
    Audiology; 1976; 15(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 1252189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Threshold prediction using the auditory steady-state response and the tone burst auditory brain stem response: a within-subject comparison.
    Johnson TA; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2005 Dec; 26(6):559-76. PubMed ID: 16377993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tone-burst and click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in subjects with hearing loss above 0.25, 0.5, and 1 kHz.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Trzaskowski B; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Skarzynski H
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 22710662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.