These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 921606)

  • 21. Electrical stimulation of the superior olivary complex can produce cortical evoked potential and behavioral discrimination correlates of pitch perception in the rat.
    Berard DR; Coleman WR; Berger LH
    Int J Neurosci; 1983; 18(1-2):87-95. PubMed ID: 6840985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Functional role of auditory cortex in frequency processing and pitch perception.
    Tramo MJ; Shah GD; Braida LD
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Jan; 87(1):122-39. PubMed ID: 11784735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. N1 latencies of the slow auditory evoked potential.
    Arlinger SD
    Audiology; 1976; 15(5):370-5. PubMed ID: 938343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Local improvement in auditory frequency discrimination is associated with hearing-loss slope in subjects with cochlear damage.
    Thai-Van H; Micheyl C; Norena A; Collet L
    Brain; 2002 Mar; 125(Pt 3):524-37. PubMed ID: 11872610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of hearing threshold determined by auditory pathway electric responses and by behavioural responses.
    Pratt H; Sohmer H
    Audiology; 1978; 17(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 687235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Experiences in computer audiometry (ECoG and ERA).
    Khechinashvili SN; Kevanishvili ZS
    Audiology; 1974; 13(5):391-402. PubMed ID: 4370015
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Evoked potentials of the brain stem in normal and pathologic conditions: experience with 692 adult subjects].
    Burdo S
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1989; 9 Suppl 24():1-36. PubMed ID: 2686347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of nitrous oxide on auditory cortical evoked potentials and subjective thresholds.
    Houston HG; McClelland RJ; Fenwick PB
    Br J Anaesth; 1988 Nov; 61(5):606-10. PubMed ID: 3207533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Objective audiometry by recording of early and middle-latency auditory evoked potentials using an external method].
    Greiner GF; Conraux C; Feblot P
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1978; 95(1-2):33-41. PubMed ID: 655560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Characterizing the dependence of pure-tone frequency difference limens on frequency, duration, and level.
    Micheyl C; Xiao L; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2012 Oct; 292(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 22841571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Influence of the intensity of stimulation on evoked auditory potentials in normal subjects and in hypoacusia with recruitment].
    Marco J; Ruíz Carmona E
    Acta Otorinolaryngol Iber Am; 1972; 23(2):181-8 passim. PubMed ID: 5077020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Quantitative results of the brainstem audiometry in middle ear, cochlear, and retrocochlear hearing damage (author's transl)].
    Gerull G; Giesen M; Mrowinski D
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1978 Jan; 57(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 625180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cortical Representation of Interaural Time Difference Is Impaired by Deafness in Development: Evidence from Children with Early Long-term Access to Sound through Bilateral Cochlear Implants Provided Simultaneously.
    Easwar V; Yamazaki H; Deighton M; Papsin B; Gordon K
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(9):2349-2361. PubMed ID: 28123078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of audiometric configuration on pure-tone, warble-tone and narrow-band noise thresholds of adults with sensorineural hearing losses.
    Stephens MM; Rintelmann WF
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(5):221-6. PubMed ID: 659294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in unsuccessful cochlear implant users.
    Munivrana B; Mildner V
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2013 Jul; 27(6-7):472-83. PubMed ID: 23621479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Frequency discrimination thresholds: the effect of increment versus decrement detection of frequency.
    Kishon-Rabin L; Roth DA; Van Dijk B; Yinon T; Amir O
    J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol; 2004; 15(1-2):29-40. PubMed ID: 15485128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pitch matching in bimodal cochlear implant patients: Effects of frequency, spectral envelope, and level.
    Maarefvand M; Blamey PJ; Marozeau J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Nov; 142(5):2854. PubMed ID: 29195427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials to Evaluate Cochlear Implant Candidacy in an Ear With Long-standing Hearing Loss: A Case Report.
    Patel TR; Shahin AJ; Bhat J; Welling DB; Moberly AC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Oct; 125(10):858-61. PubMed ID: 27357975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.