These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9218111)

  • 1. Alternatives to ceramic brackets: the tensile bond strengths of two aesthetic brackets compared ex vivo with stainless steel foil-mesh bracket bases.
    Arici S; Regan D
    Br J Orthod; 1997 May; 24(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 9218111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention capacity of the bracket bases of new esthetic orthodontic brackets.
    Blalock KA; Powers JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Jun; 107(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 7771364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro comparison of the retention capacity of new aesthetic brackets.
    Fernandez L; Canut JA
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 10191580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bond strength evaluation of ceramic and stainless steel bracket bases subjected to cyclic tensile loading.
    Soderquist SA; Drummond JL; Evans CA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Feb; 129(2):175.e7-175.e12. PubMed ID: 16473707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of failure characteristics and bond strength after ceramic and polycarbonate bracket debonding: effect of bracket base silanization.
    Ozcan M; Finnema K; Ybema A
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 18209212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of ceramic bracket base designs.
    Bordeaux JM; Moore RN; Bagby MD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Jun; 105(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 8198079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ceramic bracket bonding: a comparison of shear, tensile, and torsional bond strengths of ceramic brackets.
    Merrill SW; Oesterle LJ; Hermesch CB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Sep; 106(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 8074094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shear bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets to enamel.
    Britton JC; McInnes P; Weinberg R; Ledoux WR; Retief DH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Oct; 98(4):348-53. PubMed ID: 2145756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of saliva and water contamination on the enamel shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer cement.
    Cacciafesta V; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Süssenberger U; Miethke RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Apr; 113(4):402-7. PubMed ID: 9563355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bond strength: a comparison between chemical coated and mechanical interlock bases of ceramic and metal brackets.
    Wang WN; Meng CL; Tarng TH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Apr; 111(4):374-81. PubMed ID: 9109582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with chemical or mechanical retention.
    Forsberg CM; Hagberg C
    Br J Orthod; 1992 Aug; 19(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 1390574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bond strength of ceramic brackets under shear stress: an in vitro report.
    Viazis AD; Cavanaugh G; Bevis RR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Sep; 98(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 2144942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture strength of ceramic bracket tie wings subjected to tension.
    Johnson G; Walker MP; Kula K
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jan; 75(1):95-100. PubMed ID: 15747822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of frictional forces of polycarbonate self-ligating brackets.
    Fernandes DJ; Miguel JA; Quintão CC; Elias CN
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 20877734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of different ceramic bracket base designs.
    Olsen ME; Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(3):179-82. PubMed ID: 9188961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins.
    Joseph VP; Rossouw E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Feb; 97(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 2137284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bond strength of orthodontic direct-bonding cement-bracket systems as studied in vitro.
    Buzzitta VA; Hallgren SE; Powers JM
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Feb; 81(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 6758593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The crystal growth technique--a laboratory evaluation of bond strengths.
    Jones SP; Gledhill JR; Davies EH
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 10191582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Different Bracket's Resistance to Torsional Forces from Archwire.
    Khanapure CC; Ayesha S; Sam G; Kumar VJ; Deepika C; Ahmed H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):564-7. PubMed ID: 27595723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The tensile bond strength of new and rebonded stainless steel orthodontic brackets.
    Regan D; LeMasney B; van Noort R
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Apr; 15(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 8500538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.