These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9218111)
21. Torsional creep of polycarbonate orthodontic brackets. Alkire RG; Bagby MD; Gladwin MA; Kim H Dent Mater; 1997 Jan; 13(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 9467316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A study to compare the effects of simulated torquing forces on pre-adjusted orthodontic brackets. McKnight MM; Jones SP; Davies EH Br J Orthod; 1994 Nov; 21(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 7857895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bond strength of disinfected metal and ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Speer C; Zimny D; Hopfenmueller W; Holtgrave EA Angle Orthod; 2005 Sep; 75(5):836-42. PubMed ID: 16279832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In vitro peel/shear bond strength evaluation of orthodontic bracket base design. Willems G; Carels CE; Verbeke G J Dent; 1997; 25(3-4):271-8. PubMed ID: 9175357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of enamel bleaching on the shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets. Oztaş E; Bağdelen G; Kiliçoğlu H; Ulukapi H; Aydin I Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):232-7. PubMed ID: 21262931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets. Haydar B; Sarikaya S; Cehreli ZC Angle Orthod; 1999 Oct; 69(5):457-62. PubMed ID: 10515144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Shear/peel bond strength of repositioned ceramic brackets. Gaffey PG; Major PW; Glover K; Grace M; Koehler JR Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(5):351-7. PubMed ID: 8526294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparison of the shear-peel and third-order bond strengths of orthodontic brackets with 2 etch techniques and the role of bracket asymmetry. Gibb AJ; Katona TR Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):699.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17169729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The use of debonding pliers in the removal of ceramic brackets: force levels and enamel cracks. Bishara SE; Fonseca JM; Boyer DB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Sep; 108(3):242-8. PubMed ID: 7661139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bond strength of aged composites found in brackets placed by an indirect technique. Shiau JY; Rasmussen ST; Phelps AE; Enlow DH; Wolf GR Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 8214790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires. Bednar JR; Gruendeman GW; Sandrik JL Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Dec; 100(6):513-22. PubMed ID: 1962604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of modifying the bonding protocol on the shear bond strength of metallic and ceramic orthodontic brackets. Fernandes TM; Janson G; Somensi J; Pinzan A; Francisconi PA; Sathler R; Henriques JF Gen Dent; 2012; 60(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22313980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Changes in shear bond strength of ceramic and stainless steel brackets with different visible light curing times and directions. Heravi F; Bayani S Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 20043551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of different debonding techniques on the debonding forces and failure modes of ceramic brackets in simulated clinical set-ups. Chen HY; Su MZ; Chang HF; Chen YJ; Lan WH; Lin CP Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Nov; 132(5):680-6. PubMed ID: 18005844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effects of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary polycarbonate crowns. Blakey R; Mah J Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 20620836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]