BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9218895)

  • 21. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance: clinically significant lesions and means of patient follow-up.
    Soofer SB; Sidawy MK
    Cancer; 2000 Aug; 90(4):207-14. PubMed ID: 10966560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
    Kim TJ; Kim HS; Park CT; Park IS; Hong SR; Park JS; Shim JU
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Cytologic predictive value for glandular involvement in high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    MattoĊ›inho de Castro Ferraz Mda G; Focchi J; Stavale JN; Nicolau SM; Rodrigues de Lima G; Baracat EC
    Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 12685181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Incidence and evaluation of an AGUS Papanicolaou smear in primary care.
    Valdini A; Vaccaro C; Pechinsky G; Abernathy V
    J Am Board Fam Pract; 2001; 14(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 11355048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance.
    Cheng RF; Hernandez E; Anderson LL; Heller PB; Shank R
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Nov; 44(11):922-8. PubMed ID: 10589401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Controversial categories in cytopathology of the uterine cervix. II. AGUS: atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance].
    Cenci M; Chieppa A; Vecchione A
    Minerva Ginecol; 2001 Feb; 53(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 11279397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diverse glandular pathologies coexist with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in cyto-histological review of atypical glandular cells on ThinPrep specimens.
    Kumar N; Bongiovanni M; Molliet MJ; Pelte MF; Egger JF; Pache JC
    Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):351-8. PubMed ID: 18522633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Low-grade Papanicolaou smears and the Bethesda system: a prospective cytohistopathologic analysis.
    Lonky NM; Navarre GL; Saunders S; Sadeghi M; Wolde-Tsadik G
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 May; 85(5 Pt 1):716-20. PubMed ID: 7724102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Human papillomavirus testing as triage for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: sensitivity, specificity, and cost-effectiveness.
    Kaufman RH; Adam E; Icenogle J; Reeves WC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Oct; 177(4):930-6. PubMed ID: 9369847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Endocervical atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. I. Morphometric and cytologic characterization of cases that "cannot rule out adenocarcinoma in situ".
    Cenci M; Mancini R; Nofroni I; Vecchione A
    Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(3):319-26. PubMed ID: 10833985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Subtyping as a predictor of outcome.
    Reuss E; Price J; Koonings P
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):701-5. PubMed ID: 11547641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in cervical cytologic findings.
    Manetta A; Keefe K; Lin F; Ahdoot D; Kaleb V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Apr; 180(4):883-8. PubMed ID: 10203656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation and management of the AGUS Papanicolaou smear.
    Kaferle JE; Malouin JM
    Am Fam Physician; 2001 Jun; 63(11):2239-44. PubMed ID: 11417776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Expression of the MN antigen in cervical papanicolaou smears is an early diagnostic biomarker of cervical dysplasia.
    Liao SY; Stanbridge EJ
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 Jul; 5(7):549-57. PubMed ID: 8827360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cytologic and histologic review of atypical glandular cells (AGC) detected during cervical cytology screening.
    Jeng CJ; Liang HS; Wang TY; Shen J; Yang YC; Tzeng CR
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2003; 13(4):518-21. PubMed ID: 12911731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance upon cervical cytologic examination in Israeli Jewish women.
    Gutman G; Bachar R; Pauzner D; Lessing JB; Schejter E
    Br J Cancer; 2004 Jun; 90(11):2194-6. PubMed ID: 15150573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Histologic findings and proposed management.
    Hammoud MM; Haefner HK; Michael CW; Ansbacher R
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Apr; 47(4):266-70. PubMed ID: 12012877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
    Poomtavorn Y; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Maireang K
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A retrospective review on atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) using the Bethesda 2001 classification.
    Tam KF; Cheung AN; Liu KL; Ng TY; Pun TC; Chan YM; Wong LC; Ng AW; Ngan HY
    Gynecol Oncol; 2003 Dec; 91(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 14675684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The 2001 Bethesda System terminology.
    Apgar BS; Zoschnick L; Wright TC
    Am Fam Physician; 2003 Nov; 68(10):1992-8. PubMed ID: 14655809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.