These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9219499)
1. A new instrument to measure patient satisfaction with mammography. Validity, reliability, and discriminatory power. Loeken K; Steine S; Sandvik L; Laerum E Med Care; 1997 Jul; 35(7):731-41. PubMed ID: 9219499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and validation of an instrument assessing women's satisfaction with screening mammography in an organized breast cancer screening program. Bairati I; Turcotte S; Doray G; Belleau F; Grégoire L BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 Jan; 14():9. PubMed ID: 24397342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scoring and psychometric properties of the Eye-Drop Satisfaction Questionnaire (EDSQ), an instrument to assess satisfaction and compliance with glaucoma treatment. Regnault A; Viala-Danten M; Gilet H; Berdeaux G BMC Ophthalmol; 2010 Feb; 10():1. PubMed ID: 20122146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and validation of an instrument to measure satisfaction of participants at breast screening programmes. Cockburn J; Hill D; Irwig L; De Luise T; Turnbull D; Schofield P Eur J Cancer; 1991; 27(7):827-31. PubMed ID: 1834111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS): tests of data quality and measurement properties. Ramsay J; Campbell JL; Schroter S; Green J; Roland M Fam Pract; 2000 Oct; 17(5):372-9. PubMed ID: 11021894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new measure of patient satisfaction with mammography. Validation by factor analytic technique. Loeken K; Steine S; Sandvik L; Laerum E; Finset A Fam Pract; 1996 Feb; 13(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 8671106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of the Informed Choice in Mammography Screening Questionnaire (IMQ): factor structure, reliability, and validity. Reder M; Berens EM; Spallek J; Kolip P BMC Psychol; 2019 Mar; 7(1):17. PubMed ID: 30890190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Norwegian patient experiences with GP questionnaire (PEQ-GP): reliability and construct validity following a national survey. Holmboe O; Iversen HH; Danielsen K; Bjertnaes O BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(9):e016644. PubMed ID: 28971964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality control in a National Program for the Early Detection of Breast Cancer: women's satisfaction with the mammography process. Almog R; Hagoel L; Tamir A; Barnett O; Rennert G Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 18319148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PIPEQ-OS--an instrument for on-site measurements of the experiences of inpatients at psychiatric institutions. Bjertnaes O; Iversen HH; Kjollesdal J BMC Psychiatry; 2015 Oct; 15():234. PubMed ID: 26444263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and preliminary psychometric investigation of the German Satisfaction with Comprehensive Cancer Care (SCCC) Questionnaire. Esser P; Sautier L; Sarkar S; Schilling G; Bokemeyer C; Koch U; Friedrich M; Defossez G; Mehnert-Theuerkauf A Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 May; 19(1):147. PubMed ID: 34001165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient experiences questionnaire for interdisciplinary treatment for substance dependence (PEQ-ITSD): reliability and validity following a national survey in Norway. Haugum M; Iversen HH; Bjertnaes O; Lindahl AK BMC Psychiatry; 2017 Feb; 17(1):73. PubMed ID: 28219361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammography: influence of departmental practice and women's characteristics on patient satisfaction: comparison of six departments in Norway. Løken K; Steine S; Laerum E Qual Health Care; 1998 Sep; 7(3):136-41. PubMed ID: 10185139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Construction of a questionnaire measuring outpatients' opinion of quality of hospital consultation departments. Gasquet I; Villeminot S; Estaquio C; Durieux P; Ravaud P; Falissard B Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2004 Aug; 2():43. PubMed ID: 15294020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving the assessment of (in)patients' satisfaction with hospital care. Hendriks AA; Vrielink MR; Smets EM; van Es SQ; De Haes JC Med Care; 2001 Mar; 39(3):270-83. PubMed ID: 11242321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating satisfaction with maternity care in women from minority ethnic communities: development and validation of a Sylheti questionnaire. Duff LA; Lamping DL; Ahmed LB Int J Qual Health Care; 2001 Jun; 13(3):215-30. PubMed ID: 11476146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient satisfaction with hospital services: development and testing of a measuring instrument. Mokhtar SA; Guirguis WW; al-Torkey MM; Aziz Khalaf A J Egypt Public Health Assoc; 1991; 66(5-6):693-722. PubMed ID: 1797972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and validation of an audit instrument: the Prostate Outcomes Questionnaire. Lamping DL; Rowe P; Black N; Lessof L Br J Urol; 1998 Jul; 82(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 9698662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Development and validation of the "Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire" (SATMED-Q). Ruiz MA; Pardo A; Rejas J; Soto J; Villasante F; Aranguren JL Value Health; 2008; 11(5):913-26. PubMed ID: 18494753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring patient satisfaction with health care treatment using the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction measure delivered superior and robust satisfaction estimates. Hawthorne G; Sansoni J; Hayes L; Marosszeky N; Sansoni E J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 May; 67(5):527-37. PubMed ID: 24698296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]