These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9219995)

  • 1. Comparison between the sequential and simultaneous approaches for the restoration of adjacent proximal cavities.
    Geiger SB
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Jun; 24(6):473-6. PubMed ID: 9219995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Restorative Thresholds for Carious Lesions: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Innes NPT; Schwendicke F
    J Dent Res; 2017 May; 96(5):501-508. PubMed ID: 28195749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentists' restorative decision-making and implications for an 'amalgamless' profession. Part 4: clinical factor.
    Alexander G; Hopcraft MS; Tyas MJ; Wong R
    Aust Dent J; 2017 Sep; 62(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28437002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Approximal and occlusal carious lesions: Restorative treatment decisions by California dentists.
    Rechmann P; Doméjean S; Rechmann BM; Kinsel R; Featherstone JD
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 May; 147(5):328-38. PubMed ID: 26869312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. UK dentists' attitudes and behaviour towards Atraumatic Restorative Treatment for primary teeth.
    Burke FJ; McHugh S; Shaw L; Hosey MT; Macpherson L; Delargy S; Dopheide B
    Br Dent J; 2005 Sep; 199(6):365-9; discussion 353; quiz 372. PubMed ID: 16184117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repair Versus Replacement of Restorations.
    Larson TD
    Northwest Dent; 2016 Sep; 95(4):35-9. PubMed ID: 30549767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repair or Replacement of Restorations: A Prospective cohort study by dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Rindal DB; Qvist V; Fellows JL; Dilbone DA; Brotman SG; Gilbert GH;
    Tex Dent J; 2017 Jan; 134(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 30549672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinicians' choices of restorative materials for children.
    Tran LA; Messer LB
    Aust Dent J; 2003 Dec; 48(4):221-32. PubMed ID: 14738124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of lining materials under posterior resin composite restorations in the UK.
    Blum IR; Younis N; Wilson NH
    J Dent; 2017 Feb; 57():66-72. PubMed ID: 27988345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repair or replacement of restorations: A prospective cohort study by dentists in The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Gordan VV; Riley JL; Rindal DB; Qvist V; Fellows JL; Dilbone DA; Brotman SG; Gilbert GH;
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2015 Dec; 146(12):895-903. PubMed ID: 26610834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. French dentists' restorative treatment decisions.
    Doméjean-Orliaguet S; Tubert-Jeannin S; Riordan PJ; Espelid I; Tveit AB
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2004; 2(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 15646946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
    Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
    J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Placement of posterior composite restorations in United Kingdom dental practices: techniques, problems, and attitudes.
    Gilmour AS; Latif M; Addy LD; Lynch CD
    Int Dent J; 2009 Jun; 59(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 19637523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In your dental practice, is dental amalgam still the restorative material of choice?
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Aug; 133(8):1046. PubMed ID: 12198982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Composite Restorations: Wheels of Progress Continue to Turn.
    Vakay R
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Jun; 36(6):442-3. PubMed ID: 26053784
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Teeth with large amalgam restorations and crowns: factors affecting the receipt of subsequent treatment after 10 years.
    Kolker JL; Damiano PC; Caplan DJ; Armstrong SR; Dawson DV; Jones MP; Flach SD; Warren JJ; Kuthy RA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Jun; 136(6):738-48; quiz 805-6. PubMed ID: 16022038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Decision to Repair or Replace a Defective Restoration is Affected by Who Placed the Original Restoration: Findings from the National Dental PBRN.
    Gordan VV; Riley J; Geraldeli S; Williams OD; Spoto JC; Gilbert GH;
    Tex Dent J; 2015 Jul; 132(7):448-58. PubMed ID: 26470521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why, when, and how general practitioners restore endodontically treated teeth: a representative survey in Germany.
    Naumann M; Neuhaus KW; Kölpin M; Seemann R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Mar; 20(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 26082310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques.
    El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contemporary dental practice in the UK in 2008: aspects of direct restorations, endodontics and bleaching.
    Brunton PA; Burke FJ; Sharif MO; Creanor S; Hosey MT; Mannocci F; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2012 Jan; 212(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 22281627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.