130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9220692)
1. Report of the NMA panel on mammography.
Morgan RC
J Natl Med Assoc; 1997 Jul; 89(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 9220692
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. NCI reverses one expert panel, sides with another.
Taubes G
Science; 1997 Apr; 276(5309):27-8. PubMed ID: 9122702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening guidelines for African-American women: looking at the facts and sorting out the confusion.
Patterson EA
J Natl Med Assoc; 1994 Jun; 86(6):415-6. PubMed ID: 8078076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The breast-screening brawl.
Taubes G
Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5303):1056-9. PubMed ID: 9054004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The breast cancer screening controversy and the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Breast Cancer Screening for Women Ages 40-49.
Kopans DB
Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 9885578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening mammography for women in their forties: the Panel of Babel.
Healy BP
J Womens Health; 1997 Feb; 6(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 9065366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. NIH consensus panel spurs discontent.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1997 Feb; 277(7):519-20. PubMed ID: 9032145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The mammogram war.
Begley S
Newsweek; 1997 Feb; 129(8):54-8. PubMed ID: 10164990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammography screening for women aged 40 through 49--a guidelines saga and a clarion call for informed decision making.
Ernster VL
Am J Public Health; 1997 Jul; 87(7):1103-6. PubMed ID: 9240097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The mammography muddle.
Rogers LF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1151. PubMed ID: 9129402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Final mammography recommendation?
Marwick C
JAMA; 1997 Apr; 277(15):1181. PubMed ID: 9103327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation is not causation.
Rimer BK
Am J Public Health; 1998 May; 88(5):832-3; discussion 834-5. PubMed ID: 9585761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Preserving scientific debate and patient choice: lessons from the Consensus Panel on Mammography Screening. National Institutes of Health.
Woolf SH; Lawrence RS
JAMA; 1997 Dec; 278(23):2105-8. PubMed ID: 9403427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Relationship between earlier and later mammography screening--California Medicare, 1992 through 1994.
Parker JD; Sabogal F; Gebretsadik T
West J Med; 1999 Jan; 170(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 9926732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Current controversy on the effectiveness of mammographic screening for breast cancer in western nations].
Kuriyama S; Tsuji I
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 2004 Feb; 31(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 14997744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Affordable preventive health screening: mammograms for older African American women.
Maddox MA; Gibson F
Ky Nurse; 1995; 43(2):17-8. PubMed ID: 7564404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammography screening for breast cancer. Reply to the commentaries.
Kopans DB; Halpern E; Hulka CA
Cancer; 1994 Aug; 74(4):1212-6. PubMed ID: 8055440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer screening policy.
Cox B
N Z Med J; 1998 Nov; 111(1078):459. PubMed ID: 9891567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence-based advocacy rather than emotion in defense of screening mammography.
Patti J; Lee C
Radiology; 2010 Oct; 257(1):295-6; author reply 296-7. PubMed ID: 20851948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. News media coverage of screening mammography for women in their 40s and tamoxifen for primary prevention of breast cancer.
Schwartz LM; Woloshin S
JAMA; 2002 Jun; 287(23):3136-42. PubMed ID: 12069679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
