64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9220748)
1. Measurement algorithm accuracy of the RVG-PCi in vertical and diagonal assessments at various beam energies.
Garlock JA; Scarfe WC; Kamer KR; Farman AG
J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):646-50. PubMed ID: 9220748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endodontic measurement accuracy and perceived radiograph quality: effects of film speed and density.
Sheaffer JC; Eleazer PD; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):441-8. PubMed ID: 14561969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.
Sanderink GC; Huiskens R; van der Stelt PF; Welander US; Stheeman SE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8078654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using RadioVisiography.
Leddy BJ; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE
J Endod; 1994 Nov; 20(11):542-5. PubMed ID: 7643038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image-receptor performance: a comparison of Trophy RVG UI sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film.
Ludlow J; Mol A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 11174581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of digital and geometric unsharpness in dental radiographs using an endodontic file model.
Radan E; Price C
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Feb; 93(2):208-14. PubMed ID: 11862213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of various digital processing algorithms on the measurement accuracy of endodontic file length.
Kal BI; Baksi BG; Dündar N; Sen BH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 17234548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of three imaging techniques for assessing endodontic working length.
Griffiths BM; Brown JE; Hyatt AT; Linney AD
Int Endod J; 1992 Nov; 25(6):279-87. PubMed ID: 1306859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of imaging system and exposure on accurate detection of the second mesio-buccal canal in maxillary molar teeth.
Ramamurthy R; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Dec; 102(6):796-802. PubMed ID: 17138184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of Kodak Ultraspeed and Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray films for use in endodontics.
Moule AJ; Wong A; Monsour PA; Basford KE
Aust Dent J; 2001 Jun; 46(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 11491237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography.
Shearer AC; Horner K; Wilson NH
Int Endod J; 1991 Sep; 24(5):233-9. PubMed ID: 1813427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of combined digital imaging parameters on endodontic file measurements.
de Oliveira ML; Pinto GC; Ambrosano GM; Tosoni GM
J Endod; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1404-7. PubMed ID: 22980188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurement accuracy: a comparison of two intra-oral digital radiographic systems, RadioVisiography-S and FlashDent, with analog film.
Scarfe WC; Norton S; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 9161164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of Ektaspeed Plus film versus Ultraspeed film for endodontic working length determination.
Brown R; Hadley JN; Chambers DW
J Endod; 1998 Jan; 24(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 9487870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitometric and clinical evaluation of a new F-speed dental X-ray film.
Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 11175272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of ambient light and bit depth of digital radiograph on observer performance in determination of endodontic file positioning.
Heo MS; Han DH; An BM; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 17604662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimated skin exposure as an indicator for comparing radiovisiography (RVG) versus conventional Ektaspeed Plus dental radiography.
Jones GA; Schuman NJ; Woods MA
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 9643185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measurement of endodontic file lengths: calibrated versus uncalibrated digital images.
Loushine RJ; Weller RN; Kimbrough WF; Potter BJ
J Endod; 2001 Dec; 27(12):779-81. PubMed ID: 11771590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose reduction of two digital sensor systems measuring file lengths.
Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van der Stelt PF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 May; 81(5):607-12. PubMed ID: 8734712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
