These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9221304)

  • 1. [The concept of therapeutic equivalence].
    Lange S; Windeler J
    Med Klin (Munich); 1997 Apr; 92(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 9221304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The importance of equivalence trials in showing the usefulness of treatments].
    Hermens ML; van Hout HP; Terluin B; Adèr HJ; de Haan M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2003 Nov; 147(44):2162-6. PubMed ID: 14626832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Practical experience with the design and analysis of a three-armed equivalence study.
    Lange S; Freitag G; Trampisch HJ
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 1998 Sep; 54(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 9832295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Methodological and statistical aspects of equivalence and non inferiority trials].
    Elie C; De Rycke Y; Jais JP; Marion-Gallois R; Landais P
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2008 Aug; 56(4):267-77. PubMed ID: 18703296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical and statistical issues in therapeutic equivalence trials.
    Garbe E; Röhmel J; Gundert-Remy U
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 1993; 45(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 8405023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Methodology for superiority versus equivalence and non-inferior clinical studies. A practical review].
    Rosas-Peralta M; Santos-Martínez LE; Magaña-Serrano JA; Valencia-Sánchez JS; Garrido-Garduño M; Pérez-Rodríguez G
    Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc; 2016; 54(3):344-53. PubMed ID: 27100981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current issues in clinical equivalence trials.
    Blackwelder WC
    J Dent Res; 2004; 83 Spec No C():C113-5. PubMed ID: 15286135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials.
    Christensen E
    J Hepatol; 2007 May; 46(5):947-54. PubMed ID: 17412447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological standards for assessing therapeutic equivalence.
    Kirshner B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1991; 44(8):839-49. PubMed ID: 1941037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Establishing equivalence or non-inferiority in clinical trials: part 20 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications.
    Wellek S; Blettner M
    Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2012 Oct; 109(41):674-9. PubMed ID: 23264808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Similar, the same or just not different: a guide for deciding whether treatments are clinically equivalent. [Dept. of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Univ. of Western Ontario, London, Ontario].
    Massel D
    Can J Cardiol; 1999 May; 15(5):556-62. PubMed ID: 10350665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Active control equivalence trials: some methodological aspects.
    Ferner U; Neumann N
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1992; 106 Suppl():S93-5. PubMed ID: 1546152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Non-inferiority trial used in venous thromboembolic disease. A warily interpretation is necessary!].
    Pérard L; Hot A; Cucherat M; Simon M; Desmurs H; Coppéré B; Girard-Madoux MH; Boissel JP; Ninet J
    Rev Med Interne; 2007 Nov; 28(11):731-6. PubMed ID: 17597259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Claims of equivalence in randomized controlled trials of the treatment of bacterial meningitis in children.
    Krysan DJ; Kemper AR
    Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2002 Aug; 21(8):753-8. PubMed ID: 12192164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Planning and monitoring of equivalence studies.
    Durrleman S; Simon R
    Biometrics; 1990 Jun; 46(2):329-36. PubMed ID: 2194579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods.
    Jones B; Jarvis P; Lewis JA; Ebbutt AF
    BMJ; 1996 Jul; 313(7048):36-9. PubMed ID: 8664772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Equivalence trials: methodologic analysis.
    Carneiro A
    Rev Port Cardiol; 2003 Sep; 22(9):1125-39. PubMed ID: 14655314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Issues of simultaneous tests for noninferiority and superiority.
    Ng TH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Nov; 13(4):629-39; discussion 641-62. PubMed ID: 14584713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical vs clinical significance in product testing: can they be designed to satisfy equivalence?
    Kingman A
    J Public Health Dent; 1992; 52(6):353-60. PubMed ID: 1432923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Therapeutic equivalence: all studies are not created equal.
    Hatala R; Holbrook A; Goldsmith CH
    Can J Clin Pharmacol; 1999; 6(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 10465859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.