119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9222102)
1. A t-statistic for objective interpretation of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) profiles.
Moore DH; Pallavicini M; Cher ML; Gray JW
Cytometry; 1997 Jul; 28(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 9222102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two novel in vitro human hepatoblastoma models, HepU1 and HepU2, are highly characteristic of fetal-embryonal differentiation in hepatoblastoma.
Scheil S; Hagen S; Brüderlein S; Leuschner I; Behnisch W; Möller P
Int J Cancer; 2003 Jun; 105(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 12704668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Molecular cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma and plasma cell leukemia measured using comparative genomic hybridization.
Avet-Loiseau H; Andree-Ashley LE; Moore D; Mellerin MP; Feusner J; Bataille R; Pallavicini MG
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Jun; 19(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 9172003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cytogenetic view of standard comparative genomic hybridization (CGH): deletions of 20q in human leukemia as a measure of the sensitivity of the technique.
Brecevic L; Verdorfer I; Saul W; Trautmann U; Gebhart E
Anticancer Res; 2001; 21(1A):89-92. PubMed ID: 11299794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors.
Kallioniemi OP; Kallioniemi A; Piper J; Isola J; Waldman FM; Gray JW; Pinkel D
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1994 Aug; 10(4):231-43. PubMed ID: 7522536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genetic diagnosis by comparative genomic hybridization in adult de novo acute myelocytic leukemia.
Casas S; Aventín A; Fuentes F; Vallespí T; Granada I; Carrió A; Angel Martínez-Climent J; Solé F; Teixidó M; Bernués M; Duarte J; Maria Hernández J; Brunet S; Dolors Coll M; Sierra J
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2004 Aug; 153(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 15325089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization.
du Manoir S; Speicher MR; Joos S; Schröck E; Popp S; Döhner H; Kovacs G; Robert-Nicoud M; Lichter P; Cremer T
Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 90(6):590-610. PubMed ID: 8444465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. DNA in situ hybridization (interphase cytogenetics) versus comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in human cancer: detection of numerical and structural chromosome aberrations.
Van Dekken H; Krijtenburg PJ; Alers JC
Acta Histochem; 2000 Feb; 102(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 10726167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Image analysis for comparative genomic hybridization based on a karyotyping program for windows.
Roth K; Wolf G; Dietel M; Petersen I
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 1997 Dec; 19(6):461-74. PubMed ID: 9893900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of fluorescein isothiocyanate- and Texas red-conjugated nucleotides for direct labeling in comparative genomic hybridization.
Larramendy ML; El-Rifai W; Knuutila S
Cytometry; 1998 Mar; 31(3):174-9. PubMed ID: 9515716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of a de novo unbalanced chromosome rearrangement by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Levy B; Gershin IF; Desnick RJ; Babu A; Gelb BD; Hirschhorn K; Cotter PD
Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1997; 76(1-2):68-71. PubMed ID: 9154131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic aberrations in prostate carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis: association with progression and angiogenesis.
Strohmeyer DM; Berger AP; Moore DH; Bartsch G; Klocker H; Carroll PR; Loening SA; Jensen RH
Prostate; 2004 Apr; 59(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 14991865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CGHPRO -- a comprehensive data analysis tool for array CGH.
Chen W; Erdogan F; Ropers HH; Lenzner S; Ullmann R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():85. PubMed ID: 15807904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative study of renal cell carcinoma by CGH, multicolor-FISH and conventional cytogenic banding analysis.
Sanjmyatav J; Schubert J; Junker K
Oncol Rep; 2005 Nov; 14(5):1183-7. PubMed ID: 16211283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Objective aneuploidy detection for fetal and neonatal screening using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).
Yu LC; Moore DH; Magrane G; Cronin J; Pinkel D; Lebo RV; Gray JW
Cytometry; 1997 Jul; 28(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 9222103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative genomic hybridization in the investigation of myeloid leukemias.
Bentz M; Döhner H; Huck K; Schütz B; Ganser A; Joos S; du Manoir S; Lichter P
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1995 Mar; 12(3):193-200. PubMed ID: 7536458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Statistical methods for detecting genomic alterations through array-based comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).
Wang Y; Guo SW
Front Biosci; 2004 Jan; 9():540-9. PubMed ID: 14766389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative genomic hybridization-aided unraveling of complex karyotypes in human hematopoietic neoplasias.
Verdorfer I; Brecevic L; Saul W; Schenker B; Kirsch M; Trautmann U; Helm G; Gramatzki M; Gebhart E
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2001 Jan; 124(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11165314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of changes in DNA copy number in multiple myeloma.
Rao PH
Methods Mol Med; 2005; 113():71-83. PubMed ID: 15968096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of the human myeloid leukemia-derived cell line GF-D8 by multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization, subtelomeric probes, and comparative genomic hybridization.
Tosi S; Giudici G; Rambaldi A; Scherer SW; Bray-Ward P; Dirscherl L; Biondi A; Kearney L
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1999 Mar; 24(3):213-21. PubMed ID: 10451701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
