119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9222102)
21. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays.
Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG
Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative genomic hybridization: a new tool in cancer pathology.
Hermsen MA; Meijer GA; Baak JP; Joenje H; Walboomers JJ
Hum Pathol; 1996 Apr; 27(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 8617476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative genomic hybridisation using a proximal 17p BAC/PAC array detects rearrangements responsible for four genomic disorders.
Shaw CJ; Shaw CA; Yu W; Stankiewicz P; White LD; Beaudet AL; Lupski JR
J Med Genet; 2004 Feb; 41(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 14757858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of camera requirements for comparative genomic hybridization.
Tirkkonen M; Karhu R; Kallioniemi O; Isola J
Cytometry; 1996 Dec; 25(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 8946148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative genomic hybridization in acute myeloid leukemia. A comparison with G-banding and chromosome painting.
Nacheva E; Grace C; Holloway TL; Green AR
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 1995 Jul; 82(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 7627945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Genetic aberrations in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia by comparative genomic hybridization.
Karhu R; Siitonen S; Tanner M; Keinänen M; Mäkipernaa A; Lehtinen M; Vilpo JA; Isola J
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 1997 Jun; 95(2):123-9. PubMed ID: 9169028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Molecular cytogenetic analysis of a nontumorigenic human breast epithelial cell line that eventually turns tumorigenic: validation of an analytical approach combining karyotyping, comparative genomic hybridization, chromosome painting, and single-locus fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Nielsen KV; Niebuhr E; Ejlertsen B; Holstebroe S; Madsen MW; Briand P; Mouridsen HT; Bolund L
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Sep; 20(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 9290951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of spontaneous abortion.
Hu Y; Chen X; Chen LL; Xu ZF; Wang X; Cui H
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Jan; 92(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 16263126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A statistical approach for array CGH data analysis.
Picard F; Robin S; Lavielle M; Vaisse C; Daudin JJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():27. PubMed ID: 15705208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The application of comparative genomic hybridization to previously karyotyped cervical cancer cell lines.
Thein A; Trková M; Fox M; Parrington J
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2000 Jan; 116(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 10616535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High-resolution analysis of DNA copy number alterations in colorectal cancer by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.
Nakao K; Mehta KR; Fridlyand J; Moore DH; Jain AN; Lafuente A; Wiencke JW; Terdiman JP; Waldman FM
Carcinogenesis; 2004 Aug; 25(8):1345-57. PubMed ID: 15001537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparative genomic hybridization detects genomic abnormalities in 80% of follicular lymphomas.
Avet-Loiseau H; Vigier M; Moreau A; Mellerin MP; Gaillard F; Harousseau JL; Bataille R; Milpied N
Br J Haematol; 1997 Apr; 97(1):119-22. PubMed ID: 9136950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridization.
Voullaire L; Wilton L; Slater H; Williamson R
Prenat Diagn; 1999 Sep; 19(9):846-51. PubMed ID: 10521843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The application of comparative genomic hybridization as an additional tool in the chromosome analysis of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes.
Kim MH; Stewart J; Devlin C; Kim YT; Boyd E; Connor M
Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2001 Apr; 126(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 11343775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization.
du Manoir S; Schröck E; Bentz M; Speicher MR; Joos S; Ried T; Lichter P; Cremer T
Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 7705182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Analysis of hematologic diseases using conventional karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).
Wilkens L; Tchinda J; Burkhardt D; Nolte M; Werner M; Georgii A
Hum Pathol; 1998 Aug; 29(8):833-9. PubMed ID: 9712425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quality control of CGH: impact of metaphase chromosomes and the dynamic range of hybridization.
Karhu R; Kähkönen M; Kuukasjärvi T; Pennanen S; Tirkkonen M; Kallioniemi O
Cytometry; 1997 Jul; 28(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 9222104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Efficacy of high-resolution comparative genomic hybridization (HR-CGH) in detection of chromosomal abnormalities in children with acute leukaemia.
Vranova V; Mentzlova D; Oltova A; Linkova V; Zezulkova D; Filkova H; Mendelova D; Sterba J; Kuglik P
Neoplasma; 2008; 55(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 18190236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Across array comparative genomic hybridization: a strategy to reduce reference channel hybridizations.
Buffart TE; Israeli D; Tijssen M; Vosse SJ; Mrsić A; Meijer GA; Ylstra B
Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 2008 Nov; 47(11):994-1004. PubMed ID: 18663753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Polycythemia vera: analysis of DNA from blood granulocytes using comparative genomic hybridization.
Westwood NB; Gruszka-Westwood AM; Atkinson S; Pearson TC
Haematologica; 2001 May; 86(5):464-9. PubMed ID: 11410408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
